Does f(x) = kx^2 - (6k-5)x + 8k + 7 pass through (a,b) and (c,d)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gerimis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the function f(x) = kx^2 - (6k-5)x + 8k + 7 and whether it passes through the points (a,b) and (c,d). Participants explore the implications of the function's parameters and the relationship between the points and the variable k.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants examine the conditions under which the function passes through the specified points, questioning how the values of a, b, c, and d relate to k. Some express confusion about the independence of b + d from k and explore different values of k to derive equations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing various approaches to derive relationships between the variables. Some suggest that specific values of a and c may lead to b + d being independent of k, while others question the completeness of the information provided. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem may lack sufficient information regarding the values of a and c, which could affect the ability to determine b + d without dependence on k.

gerimis
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Graphic Function f(x) = kx^2 - (6k-5)x + 8k + 7 always pass through (a,b) and (c,d). So, b + d = …
 
Physics news on Phys.org
if f(x) passes through (a,b) then you know:
b=k*a2 - (6k-5)a + 8k + 7

do you see how this helps?
 
JonF said:
if f(x) passes through (a,b) then you know:
b=k*a2 - (6k-5)a + 8k + 7

do you see how this helps?


Ya, but I am still not understand, because the answer is Real Number.
 
do what i did to b with d and add them both together, you will end up with a real number in terms of a,c, and k
 
I got:
b + d = k(a² + c²) - {(6k - 5)*(a + c)} + 16k + 14

And i don't know what I've to do with that. :D
 
that is a solution
 
I don't understand :(
Because the answer options:
A. 19
B. 24
C. 29
D. 34
E. 39
 
Do you know anything about k that would restrict it beyond "an element of the reals?"
 
My sense is that there is some information missing. gerimis, are you sure you've provided all the information here?
 
  • #10
Apphysicist said:
Do you know anything about k that would restrict it beyond "an element of the reals?"

No, i don't...
I have tried to use Discriminant D>0, but i don't still get the 'k'.
 
  • #11
You can't possibly get an answer that doesn't depend on some of the variables. This is because, say we gave even more information such as the points are (-1,b) and (1,d) so we don't have a and b anymore and the quadratic is y=kx2 then we will still have the value of b+d being dependent on the value of k in the quadratic. We have b+d=2k so if k=1, then the quadratic y=x2 passes through (-1,1) and (1,1) so b+d=1+1=2. If k=2, b+d=4 etc.
 
  • #12
The problem is saying that for any value of k, the function defined by f(x) = kx^2 - (6k-5)x + 8k + 7 passes through the points (a, b) and (c, d). This means that f(a) and f(c) do not depend on the value of k.

Now, rewriting f(x) as k(x^2 - 6x + 8) - 5x + 7, what must be true of a and c, for f(a) and f(c) not to depend on the value of k?
 
  • #13
Citan Uzuki said:
This means that f(a) and f(c) do not depend on the value of k.

Yes they do...
 
  • #14
Mentallic said:
Yes they do...

There are two specific numbers a and c for which they do not. Look at the equation f(x) = k(x^2 - 6x + 8) - 5x + 7 again.
 
  • #15
Citan Uzuki said:
There are two specific numbers a and c for which they do not. Look at the equation f(x) = k(x^2 - 6x + 8) - 5x + 7 again.

Oh yes I just skimmed over your second paragraph. That specific quote however is incorrect because you cannot make that false conclusion. As you said, there are specific values of a and c such that b+d is independent of k. Maybe this is what was required of the OP?
 
  • #16
I agree that the phrasing "for any value of k", implies that the values of a, b, c, and d must not depend on k. If that is true then we must have,
taking k= 0, [itex]b+ d= 5a- 5c+ 14[/itex]
taking k= 1, [itex]b+ d= a^2+ c^2- a- c+ 30[/itex]
taking k= -1, [itex]b+ d= -a^2- c^2+ 21a+ 21c- 2[/itex]
taking k= 2, [itex]b+ d= 2a^2+ 2c^2- 27a- 27c+ 46[/itex]

That gives 4 equations to solve for a, b, c, and d. Since the question only asks for b+ d you may not have to solve completely.

For example, adding the second and third equation gives [itex]2(b+ d)= 19a+ 19c+ 28[/itex] while adding twice the third equation to the fourth gives 2(a+ b)= 14a- 14c+ 42. Those, together with b+ d= 5a- 5c+ 14 may allow you to solve for b+ d directly.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K