Does High Energy Electron Interaction Reveal Asymptotic Freedom in Quarks?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Manojg
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of asymptotic freedom in quarks, particularly in the context of deep inelastic scattering (DIS) where high-energy electrons interact with quarks inside hadrons. Participants explore the implications of electromagnetic interactions versus strong interactions at small distances and high energies.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants explain that quarks behave as free particles at small distances due to the decreasing strong interaction, but question why high-energy electrons in DIS perceive them as free despite the electromagnetic nature of the interaction.
  • Others assert that quarks cannot separate due to the increasing strong force as they move apart, suggesting that new quarks are created when sufficient energy is applied to separate them.
  • A participant uses an analogy involving bowling balls to illustrate the concept of quark confinement and the idea that the effective interaction (spring constant) can appear to be zero at high energies, indicating asymptotic freedom.
  • Another participant discusses the dynamics of two particles bound by a spring, suggesting that a fast projectile may cause the quarks to appear free due to the nature of their interaction during rapid perturbations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of interactions between quarks and the implications of those interactions in the context of DIS. There is no consensus on why high-energy electrons perceive quarks as free, and multiple competing perspectives remain.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of strong and electromagnetic interactions, the behavior of quarks under different energy conditions, and the limitations of analogies used to explain complex interactions.

Manojg
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have a simple question related with asymptotic freedom.
Quarks behave as free particles at small distance (separation between the quarks is small) because strong interaction decrease with decrease in distance or increase in energy. So, one quark feels almost independent of other.
Now, in DIS where hadron is probed by high energy electron: basically virtual photon interact with quarks inside the hadron. The interaction is electromagnetic. At high energy or short distance the electromagnetic interaction is larger. There is no strong interaction with the projectile. Then, why electron sees the quarks as free? Quark-quark feel them self as free from each other.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The quarks can't separate because the stong force increases as they get further apart. When enough energy is put into force them apart, new quarks come into being, attached to the original quarks, leaving them still paired.
 
mathman said:
The quarks can't separate because the stong force increases as they get further apart. When enough energy is put into force them apart, new quarks come into being, attached to the original quarks, leaving them still paired.

Yes, I know that. But my question is different. Interaction of virtual photon with quarks is electromagnetic, not strong. Then, why the electron in DIS (deep inelastic scattering) sees the quarks as free at high energy?
 
Electromagnetic scattering is well understood, so the effect can be filtered out of the results.

Imagine that you were in outerspace and 100 yards away was something that looked like a bowling ball, but someone told you it was actually three bowling balls connected together. Then you have an unlimited number of bowling balls to throw at the target, and a lot of patience.

Fairly quickly you determine that the bowling balls cannot be separated, the three of them are always connected (in my analogy this corresponds to the property of quark confinement that mathman was mentioning, although in my analogy I am ignoring the possibility of what happens when the flux tubes break).

Now you want to determine the nature of the bonds that connect the bowling balls. Basically you expect them to be connected by tight springs. Then you do a calculation of the scattering pattern you expect to occur as a function of the spring constant. After doing the experiment it turns out that the spring constant is zero, and so in fact the springs have some slack in them, asymptotic freedom.
 
Imagine two particles bound with a spring. They oscillate around an equilibrium position r_0 but most of the time they spend at extreme (turning) points where their velocity is the smallest. So most of the time they feel themselves interacting rather than free.

If you push (or pull) one of them very slowly, you will feel the total mass - the system is accelerated as a whole on average.

If you push one of them suddenly, during delta_t << oscillation period AND the perturbation of the spring propagates with finite velocity from the pushed particle to the second one (delta_t<<r_0/c), then you will "feel" only the pushed particle whatever oscillation phase is.
So for a very fast projectile, the quarks may look free.

Bob.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K