MHB Does Increasing Mass Reduce the Amplitude of a Forced SDOF Oscillator?

  • Thread starter Thread starter anum
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Amplitude Mass
anum
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I'm working on a forced single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) oscillator. I'm trying to find how an increase in mass will affect the response amplitude? I'm looking for mathematical proof explaining this reduction in amplitude. How to derive \delta x
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot (60).png
    Screenshot (60).png
    19.6 KB · Views: 131
Physics news on Phys.org
[math]X = \dfrac{F}{k} \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{ \dfrac{ 4 \zeta ^2 \omega ^2}{ \omega _n ^2 } + \left ( 1 - \dfrac{ \omega ^2 }{ \omega _n ^2 } \right ) ^2}}[/math]

So given a small variation in m, dm, we get a corresponding change in X by dX:
[math]dX = \dfrac{d}{dm} \left \{ \dfrac{F}{k} \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{ \dfrac{ 4 \zeta ^2 \omega ^2}{ \omega _n ^2 } + \left ( 1 - \dfrac{ \omega ^2 }{ \omega _n ^2 } \right ) ^2}} \right \} ~ dm[/math]

It looks pretty bad but the only variable that contains the mass is [math]\zeta[/math]. Do it step by step.

-Dan
 
$\omega_n=\sqrt(k/m)$ is also mass-dependent. Thank you for your reply.
 
i try on Maple get this.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot (61).png
    Screenshot (61).png
    59 KB · Views: 124
I'll presume that Maple got it right. Though taking that derivative by hand is good practice!

-Dan
 
According to an article, $\Delta X$ on taking mass $m+\Delta m$ is :
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot (56).png
    Screenshot (56).png
    83.8 KB · Views: 125
its different from what i got
 
Yes, it's different. I'm not sure what method your paper is using.

-Dan
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
987
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K