Does it exist and is it continuous? (exact)

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nonequilibrium
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuous
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the existence and continuity of the mixed partial derivative of an integral involving a function M from R^2 to R, specifically questioning the expression \(\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x \partial y} \int M(x,y) \mathrm{d}x\). Participants explore the implications of M having continuous partial derivatives and the conditions under which the mixed derivative can be established as continuous.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the validity of the professor's reasoning that the differentiability of M implies the differentiability of the integral with respect to x.
  • Another participant asserts that under certain assumptions, \(\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x \partial y} \int M(x,y) \mathrm{d}x\) equals \(\frac{\partial}{\partial y} M(x,y)\), but notes that continuity of this function is assumed.
  • A counterexample is provided involving the function \(M(x,y) = y^2 \sin(\frac{1}{y}) + 0x\), which illustrates that the mixed partial derivative may not be continuous at \(y = 0\).
  • Clarifications are made regarding the order of differentiation in the expression, with some participants emphasizing that the differentiation order affects the interpretation of the mixed derivative.
  • Concerns are raised about the continuity of the partial derivative with respect to y, particularly in relation to the counterexample presented.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the conditions necessary for the continuity of the mixed partial derivative. There is no consensus on whether the assumptions made about M are sufficient to guarantee the desired properties of the integral.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the importance of assumptions regarding the continuity of partial derivatives and the potential for discontinuities in specific cases, such as the counterexample provided. The implications of switching the order of differentiation are also noted as a point of contention.

nonequilibrium
Messages
1,412
Reaction score
2
Hello,

Let [tex]M[/tex] be a function from R^2 to R with image M(x,y).
Given is that [tex]M[/tex] has continuous partial derivatives [tex]\frac{\partial M(x,y)}{\partial y}[/tex] & [tex]\frac{\partial M(x,y)}{\partial x}[/tex].

Question:
Does
[tex]\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x \partial y} \int M(x,y) \mathrm d x[/tex]
exist and is it continuous?

It is used in my DE course, but I don't find it self-evident. The professor's argument was that since M was already differentiable with respect to x and y, and integrating makes it more continuous, it will definitely be differentiable. Okay I find it somewhat self-evident (with this reasoning) that
[tex]\frac{\partial}{\partial y}\int M(x,y) \mathrm d x[/tex]
exists, but how does one convince himself of this last expression being differentiable with respect to x? And even if it is differentiable with respect to x, the derivative might have an essential discontinuity (of course I'm not saying it can in this case: I believe my professor; but I don't believe in his hand-waving reasoning and I'm looking for a more rigorous/insightful argument)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you talking about the first set of lecture notes that the professor posted? If so, then
[tex] \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x \partial y} \int M(x,y) \mathrm d x = \frac{\partial}{\partial y} M(x,y)[/tex]

and it was said in the notes to assume that this function is continuous.

EDIT: I'm assuming you are in MAT267

EDIT 2: You do go to U of T, right?
 
Last edited:
JG89 said:
Are you talking about the first set of lecture notes that the professor posted? If so, then
[tex] \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x \partial y} \int M(x,y) \mathrm d x = \frac{\partial}{\partial y} M(x,y)[/tex]

and it was said in the notes to assume that this function is continuous.

EDIT: I'm assuming you are in MAT267

EDIT 2: You do go to U of T, right?

Hello. Nope, I'm from Belgium, but I suppose the theorem of exact differential equations are popular in all DE courses :p

As for your comment: that equality you give is only true if you can "mix/switch" partial derivatives, which you can only do if you already know [tex]\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x \partial y} \int M(x,y) \mathrm d x[/tex] is continuous (and existing, of course), the latter being exactly my question.
 
I didn't switch anything. [tex]\frac{\partial}{\partial x \partial y} \int M(x,y) dx[/tex] means that you first differentiate [tex]\int M(x,y) dx[/tex] with respect to x, then differentiate the resulting expression with respect to y. By the fundamental theorem of calculus, differentiating [tex]\int M(x,y) dx[/tex] with respect to x gives [tex]M(x,y)[/tex], and differentiation with respect to y can be written [tex]\frac{\partial}{\partial y} M(x,y)[/tex]. But I guess your question is whether [tex]\frac{\partial}{\partial y} M(x,y)[/tex] is continuous. In my set of lecture notes, I am to assume it is continuous, so I can't help you there. Sorry!
 
As a counter example, what about the function [tex]M(x,y) = y^2sin(\frac{1}{y}) + 0x[/tex]

[tex]\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x \partial y} \int M(x,y) dx = \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x \partial y} \int y^2sin(\frac{1}{y}) + 0x dx = \frac{\partial}{\partial y} y^2 sin(\frac{1}{y} )[/tex]

But the partial derivative with respect to y of [tex]y^2 sin(\frac{1}{y})[/tex] is not continuous when y = 0.
 
JG89: with regard to your first post: you seem to be a bit confused, the expression means you first differentiate with respect to y and then with respect to x, not the other way around.

as for your second post: your M(x,y) does not have continuous partial derivatives (because dM/dy is not continuous in zero), which I stated as a given.
 
JG89: you seem to be a bit confused, the expression means you first differentiate with respect to y and then with respect to x, not the other way around.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K