Does Jimmy Carter's long life prove some exposure to radiation is OK?

  • Thread starter Thread starter swampwiz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Life Radiation
Click For Summary
Former President Jimmy Carter, nearing the end of his life at 98, was an original US Navy nuclear engineer who played a crucial role in extracting the first melted core from a Canadian reactor over 70 years ago. During this operation, he entered a highly radioactive "dead zone," resulting in him experiencing radioactive contamination for six months. His exposure was estimated to be about 1000 times the current safety limits. While radiation damage is probabilistic and varies among individuals, it highlights the inherent risks associated with nuclear engineering. The discussion underscores the complexities of radiation exposure and its long-term effects on health.
swampwiz
Messages
567
Reaction score
83
Former USA President Jimmy Carter seems to be near the end of his 98 years, and was one of the original US Navy nuclear engineers. Over 70 years ago, he led a team that extracted out the world's first melted down core out of a Canadian reactor, himself going 90 seconds into the "dead zone" - and had radioactive urine for 6 months afterwards. It is estimated that he and his team got a dousing about 1000X as much as is allowed under today's protocols. Besides the risk of death, there was a risk that we would be infertile (4 children later, obviously that did not happen).

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/chalk-river-nuclear-accident-1.6293574
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Radiation damage is a probabilistic event so a single case does not constitute proof for changing of standards.
Everyone is exposed to radiation everyday and many survive. Some do not.
 

Thread 'What type of energy is actually stored inside an atom?'

What type of energy is actually stored inside an atom? When an atom is split—such as in a nuclear explosion—it releases enormous energy, much of it in the form of gamma-ray electromagnetic radiation. Given this, is it correct to say that the energy stored in the atom is fundamentally electromagnetic (EM) energy? If not, how should we properly understand the nature of the energy that binds the nucleus and is released during fission?
View full post »

Similar threads

Radiation exposure on person effects on it's reproduction
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K