Does Mihailescu's theorem use the infinitude of primes?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DaTario
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Primes Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Preda Mihailescu's proof of Catalan's conjecture does not explicitly rely on the infinitude of primes, although the concept is deeply embedded in number theory. The discussion highlights the complexity of determining the necessity of the infinitude of primes in various theorems. Participants express uncertainty regarding the specific role of prime exponents in Mihailescu's work, particularly concerning their divisibility. Access to Mihailescu's original paper is limited, complicating further analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Catalan's conjecture
  • Familiarity with number theory concepts
  • Knowledge of prime number properties
  • Access to academic papers on Mihailescu's theorem
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the proof of Catalan's conjecture by Preda Mihailescu
  • Study the role of prime numbers in number theory
  • Examine the implications of the infinitude of primes
  • Review academic discussions on the necessity of primes in mathematical proofs
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, number theorists, and students interested in advanced topics related to Catalan's conjecture and the role of prime numbers in proofs.

DaTario
Messages
1,097
Reaction score
46
TL;DR
Hi all,
I would like to know if in proving the Catalan's conjecture Preda Mihailescu used the infinitude of primes.
Hi all,
I would like to know if in proving the Catalan's conjecture Preda Mihailescu used the infinitude of primes.

Best wishes,
DaTario
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Do you have a reference? I guess not many people have actually read the proof. Proofs of this kind often prove upper bounds for possible solutions and check the ones below. The infiniteness of primes is so deeply woven into number theory, that it is probably impossible to figure out which theorems it is actually a necessary part of. Nobody will ever have bothered otherwise.
 
I had access to this thesis, but to his paper I haven't.

He seems to be worried with two prime numbers (the exponents) and wether one of them divides the other or not. But I am really not sure.
 

Attachments

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K