MHB Does PEMDAS Apply to All Math Equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SigmaS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Apply
SigmaS
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I was told PEMDAS isn't always followed, particularly in higher level math.
Is this true? Because I recall the purpose of PEMDAS is to prevent ambiguity, and without it, at any level, would result in ambiguity, even though it's just a convention and not something we can really prove.

Also, when you reword equations are you still relying on the concept of PEMDAS? Like, for example, to say $\frac{5}{3}n=15 \equiv 5n=45$ is to validate PEMDAS, yes?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
SigmaS said:
I was told PEMDAS isn't always followed, particularly in higher level math.
Is this true? Because I recall the purpose of PEMDAS is to prevent ambiguity, and without it, at any level, would result in ambiguity, even though it's just a convention and not something we can really prove.

Also, when you reword equations are you still relying on the concept of PEMDAS? Like, for example, to say $\frac{5}{3}n=15 \equiv 5n=45$ is to validate PEMDAS, yes?

Hi SigmaS, welcome to MHB! ;)

In higher level math we don't always deal with regular multiplication and addition.
Even then, PEMDAS is usually applied, since it does indeed eliminate ambiguity without being wordy about it.
And yes, this is international convention, so we can always assume it.

In $\frac{5}{3}n=15$ there is no ambiguity. The division is specified in such a way that it has to come first - as if it was in parentheses. So PEMDAS is irrelevant here. It only becomes relevant when we type it into a calculator, because then PEMDAS requires us to use parentheses. That is, we have to type [M]( 5 / 3 ) * n[/M] to get what was written.

Anyway, there is no need to 'validate' PEMDAS. It's just a rule that says when parentheses can be omitted without changing the expression.
The parentheses cannot be omitted in for instance $5/(3\times n)$, because $5/3\times n$ means something different.
It's different with $(5/3)\times n$, since that is the same as $5 / 3 \times n$.
In case of doubt, we should add parentheses first — according to PEMDAS — and then reword the equation.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top