MHB Does PEMDAS Apply to All Math Equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SigmaS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Apply
AI Thread Summary
PEMDAS is generally applied in higher-level math to eliminate ambiguity, although it may not always be strictly necessary. In certain cases, such as $\frac{5}{3}n=15$, the order of operations is clear and PEMDAS is not relevant. However, when inputting expressions into calculators, following PEMDAS becomes essential to ensure accurate results. The rule serves to clarify when parentheses can be omitted without altering the expression's meaning. Ultimately, using parentheses is recommended when there is any doubt about the order of operations.
SigmaS
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I was told PEMDAS isn't always followed, particularly in higher level math.
Is this true? Because I recall the purpose of PEMDAS is to prevent ambiguity, and without it, at any level, would result in ambiguity, even though it's just a convention and not something we can really prove.

Also, when you reword equations are you still relying on the concept of PEMDAS? Like, for example, to say $\frac{5}{3}n=15 \equiv 5n=45$ is to validate PEMDAS, yes?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
SigmaS said:
I was told PEMDAS isn't always followed, particularly in higher level math.
Is this true? Because I recall the purpose of PEMDAS is to prevent ambiguity, and without it, at any level, would result in ambiguity, even though it's just a convention and not something we can really prove.

Also, when you reword equations are you still relying on the concept of PEMDAS? Like, for example, to say $\frac{5}{3}n=15 \equiv 5n=45$ is to validate PEMDAS, yes?

Hi SigmaS, welcome to MHB! ;)

In higher level math we don't always deal with regular multiplication and addition.
Even then, PEMDAS is usually applied, since it does indeed eliminate ambiguity without being wordy about it.
And yes, this is international convention, so we can always assume it.

In $\frac{5}{3}n=15$ there is no ambiguity. The division is specified in such a way that it has to come first - as if it was in parentheses. So PEMDAS is irrelevant here. It only becomes relevant when we type it into a calculator, because then PEMDAS requires us to use parentheses. That is, we have to type [M]( 5 / 3 ) * n[/M] to get what was written.

Anyway, there is no need to 'validate' PEMDAS. It's just a rule that says when parentheses can be omitted without changing the expression.
The parentheses cannot be omitted in for instance $5/(3\times n)$, because $5/3\times n$ means something different.
It's different with $(5/3)\times n$, since that is the same as $5 / 3 \times n$.
In case of doubt, we should add parentheses first — according to PEMDAS — and then reword the equation.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...

Similar threads

Back
Top