Does strong force = gravity at very small distances?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the strong nuclear force and gravity, particularly at very small distances such as those between protons within an atomic nucleus. Participants explore whether gravity could be comparable to the strong force under these conditions, touching on theoretical implications and the nature of fundamental forces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if gravity, typically considered the weakest force, could be as strong as the strong force at the distances between protons in a nucleus.
  • Another participant explains that both gravity and electromagnetic forces are inverse square forces, suggesting that if electromagnetic repulsion is stronger than gravity at one distance, it remains so at all distances.
  • The strong force is described as the force that holds the nucleus together despite electromagnetic repulsion, indicating it cannot be equated with conventional gravity.
  • There is mention of black holes and how they complicate the standard inverse-square potential, but the participant argues that for particles in a nucleus, the conditions would not allow for a black hole scenario.
  • A participant notes that the strong force increases with distance within hadrons, contrasting it with gravity, which behaves differently.
  • Another participant adds that the strong force is restricted to the atomic scale and has a specific range, which contributed to its late discovery in physics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between the strong force and gravity, with some asserting that they are fundamentally different forces while others entertain the possibility of future theories that might unify them. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the potential similarities or unification of these forces.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various theoretical frameworks, such as quantum chromodynamics, and highlight limitations in understanding the forces at very small scales. There is also mention of the historical context of the discovery of the strong force.

mudderrunner
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
this is probably either a really dumb question, or just a dumb question. But with my remedial knowledge of these fundamental forces it seems a logical question to ask.

Gravity is deemed the weakest force, but maybe that's just a range related perspective. It gets stronger with decreasing distance so how strong would gravity between two particles be at the distance that two protons are from each other inside the nucleus of an atom? Maybe as strong as what is deemed the strongest force?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Both gravity and electromagnetic forces are inverse square forces. This means that if EM repulsion is stronger than gravity at one distance it will so be at all distances. But the strong force specifically is what holds the nucleus of an atom together in spite of the EM repulsion between the nuclear protons. Thus in a standard setting, NO the strong nuclear force can't be conventional gravity.

Now you might wonder then about black holes which goes beyond standard inverse-square potential. But for the particles inside a nucleus to be bound inside a little black-hole then two things would happen...a.) slamming them together you would not be able to break off parts as we see in colliders, and b.) the size would be too small for the scattering cross sections seen in experiments.

Also we have a good theory of the strong force in quantum chromodynamics. It explains the binding of nuclei, as well as the variety of particles we get when we do nuclear collisions at high energy (mesons and baryons and such). Might I suggest you read t'Hooft's book http://www.cambridge.org/uk/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=0521578833"

It is a good exposition of the history of our understanding of subatomic phenomena written for the curious layman.

Now this is not to say that some future theory might not unify the forces so we can say the strong force is "another type of gravity" or something similar. But it could also be otherwise... we won't know until we know.

EDIT: PS. By the way, I asked the very same question of my physics teacher in high school. He just laid a definitive No! No way! without explanation. Though I believed him I didn't figure out why not for some years.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thanks for the reply. That was a good explanation that I could understand. And thanks for the suggested reading, I'll check it out.
 
The strong force also increases its power with distance within the hadron, so it is quite different from gravity in that perspective.
 
loreak said:
The strong force also increases its power with distance within the hadron, so it is quite different from gravity in that perspective.

Just to add, the strong force is restricted to the atomic scale. There is a certain distance at which the strong force isn't present. That's why it wasn't discovered until physisists didn't discover this force until they started seaching the atom.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K