enquirealways
- 26
- 0
Does block universe mean that time and motion are illusions?
The discussion revolves around the implications of the block universe theory, particularly whether it suggests that time and motion are illusions. Participants explore the philosophical and scientific ramifications of this theory, questioning its validity and relevance in the context of physics.
Participants generally disagree on the significance and scientific validity of the block universe theory, with some viewing it as a philosophical question rather than a scientific one. There is no consensus on whether the theory has meaningful implications for understanding time and motion.
Participants note that the block universe theory does not yield falsifiable predictions, which raises questions about its scientific status. The discussion is also limited by the lack of empirical evidence to support or refute the claims made regarding time and motion.
phinds said:Uh ... I'll bet you moved between the time you started that sentence and the time you finished it, now didn't you.
enquirealways said:Well, can't all the activity be an illusion. Our universe could be a huge pile of time capsules.
Nugatory said:Yes, but no experiment can even in principle distinguish between that model of the universe and one in which time and motion are not illusions. Thus, the discussion tends to be sterile: it might be so, it might not be, we can't tell which it is and it doesn't make any difference either way.
It doesn't yield falsifiable predictions so it's not science, and the moderators generally shut down discussions of block universe if they don't stop at this point on their own.
enquirealways said:Why not send it to beyond the standard model.