Which theory of time is the most evidence-based?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter curiosity1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block universe
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on various theories of time, including Presentism, Eternalism, the Growing Block Universe, the Block Time Theory, and the Transactional Interpretation. Participants argue that these are interpretations rather than theories, as none provide distinct experimental predictions. The Special Theory of Relativity is highlighted as a framework that makes specific predictions regarding the speed of light and simultaneity. The conversation emphasizes the philosophical implications of these theories and the necessity of a rigorous understanding of physics to grasp the complexities of time and space.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Special Theory of Relativity
  • Familiarity with concepts of spacetime and its geometry
  • Basic knowledge of quantum mechanics and its interpretations
  • Awareness of philosophical implications in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Special Theory of Relativity on time perception
  • Explore the mathematical foundations of spacetime geometry
  • Investigate the philosophical questions surrounding the nature of time
  • Learn about the experimental evidence supporting theories of quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, philosophers of science, and anyone interested in the foundational concepts of time and its interpretations in modern physics.

  • #31
Thread closed for moderation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
After moderator review, the thread will remain closed.
 
  • #33
curiosity1 said:
Thank you very much for your detailed reply. I don't understand what space-time is. What is it made of? Isn't space just emptiness? As far as I know, at the speed of light, time stops. How does that work? I am sorry if my questions are silly - they reveal how little I understand!

The thread is shut.

Here's a comparison that might help. Remember geometry from school? Points have position but no size and a line length but no width. Such do not exist. They are abstractions. It talks about points and lines that exist in theory but not in the physical world. They're the building blocks of geometry, abstractions that help us understand the real world. Similarly, space-time is a theoretical construct that helps us make sense of the universe.

Every theory, every single one, is like that. They contain abstractions used in the theory. If you succeed in finding something deeper that either explains those concepts or somehow replaces them, in a sense, you have not got anywhere because what you replace it with has the same problem. Absolute knowledge is beyond science's grasp.

For time, like point and line, we all have an intuitive idea of what it is. To make it more precise, we need what is called an inertial frame. A frame is simply a standard of rest on which experiments can be conducted. An inertial frame has a special property - the laws of physics (again, an abstraction) are the same in any direction, at any point, or at any time. The earth is an approximate inertial frame. Suppose we have some repetitive process and count the number of times it occurs. Repetitive process is a fundamental abstraction. But since the laws of physics are the same at any point, time, or direction, we have a way to assign a number to the time it is anywhere in the frame. The count of the repetitive process measures time and is called a clock. This is the idea time is what a clock measures.

I will mention I am reading a book now that explains time at a deeper level, but it is advanced and needs as background what I wrote above:



Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: curiosity1 and Dale

Similar threads

  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
90
Views
10K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
5K