Does the Gaussian have complex poles?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mjordan2nd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Gaussian Poles
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on evaluating the integral of the Gaussian function, specifically \(\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-x^2}dx = \sqrt{\pi}\), over the complex plane using contour integration. The author explores the implications of the closed contour integral \(\oint_C e^{-z^2} dz = 0\) and concludes that the function \(e^{-z^2}\) is entire, indicating no poles in the finite complex plane. This leads to the realization that the integral along the circular contour does not vanish, ultimately affirming that \(\lim_{R\to\infty} \int_0^{\pi} e^{-z^2}dz=-\sqrt{\pi}\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of contour integration
  • Familiarity with complex analysis concepts
  • Knowledge of the Gaussian function and its properties
  • Experience with evaluating integrals in the complex plane
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of entire functions in complex analysis
  • Learn advanced techniques in contour integration
  • Explore the application of the residue theorem in complex integrals
  • Investigate other integrals involving exponential functions in the complex plane
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students of complex analysis who are interested in advanced integration techniques and the properties of the Gaussian function in the context of complex variables.

mjordan2nd
Messages
173
Reaction score
1
I know that

<br /> \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} e^{-x^2}dx = \sqrt{\pi}.<br />

What if I tried evaluating this over the complex plane? If I created a contour that ran along the real axis, then circled around from positive to negative infinity this should not change things as along the curve at infinity my complex function should be 0. So using that contour, I should have

<br /> \oint_C e^{-z^2} dz = 0,<br />

unless there are some poles in the upper half of the complex plane. But if there aren't, wouldn't this imply \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} e^{-x^2}dx = 0, since the integral over the other part of my contour is 0? I'm forced to conclude I am missing something here, but can't quite put my finger on what that might be.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So, your closed contour consists of a piece along the real axis, say from -R to R, as R tends to infinity, and then a circular contour of radius R. This circular arc part of the integral is

$$\int_0^\pi d\theta Ri e^{i\theta} \exp\left(-R^2(\cos(2\theta)+i \sin(2\theta))\right).$$

This integral is not zero, and your contour calculation shows that it must be ##-\sqrt{\pi}## as ##R \rightarrow \infty##. The reason this not zero in the limit as ##R## goes to infinity is that ##\cos(2\theta)## is not always positive on ##[0,\pi)##, so the ##\exp(-R^2\cos(2\theta))## does not drive the integral to zero.

Note: it is actually pretty tough to show that ##\int_{-\infty}^\infty dx \exp(-x^2) = \sqrt{\pi}## via contour integral methods. The only example that I've seen which actually accomplishes it had a rather non-trivial integrand.
 
Really I think that would be a sufficient proof that:

\lim_{R\to\infty} \int_0^{\pi} e^{-z^2}dz=-\sqrt{\pi},\quad z=Re^{it}

However, it is based on the fact that the function e^{-z^2} is entire and therefore has no poles in the finite complex plane.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K