Does the Leibniz Integral Rule Apply to Time-Dependent Integrals?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mcah5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Leibniz Integral Rule applies to time-dependent integrals, specifically expressed as \frac {d} {dt} \int_{a}^{b} f(x,t) dx = \int_{a}^{b} \frac {\partial} {\partial t} f(x,t) dx, under the condition that both f and \frac{\partial f}{\partial t} are continuous. This rule is valid when the integration limits a and b are constant; if they are functions of t, the formula adjusts to include boundary terms. A thorough proof can be found in the appendix of standard calculus textbooks, such as the one by Bartle, specifically on page 245. Uniform continuity of f in the region of interest is a sufficient condition for the rule's application.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of advanced calculus concepts
  • Familiarity with functional derivatives and partial derivatives
  • Knowledge of continuity conditions in mathematical functions
  • Access to calculus textbooks, particularly Bartle's
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the proof of the Leibniz Integral Rule in advanced calculus textbooks
  • Learn about the implications of uniform continuity in calculus
  • Explore applications of the Leibniz Integral Rule in physics
  • Investigate the differences between functional and partial derivatives in mathematical notation
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and educators looking to deepen their understanding of calculus, particularly those dealing with time-dependent integrals and their applications in various fields.

mcah5
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
\frac {d} {dt} \int_{a}^{b} f(x,t) dx = \int_{a}^{b} \frac {\delta} {\delta t} f(x,t) dx

From trial and error, it seems true but I can't find it in my textbook anywhere. Am I missing something obvious?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, this is true provided f and \frac{\partial f}{\partial t} are continuous. This is an example of interchanging limits. Be careful about doing that because in general you can't. This borders on advanced calculus, but my regular calc textbook gives a proof in the appendix. Maybe yours does too.
 
There's a very thorough proof on page 245 of the Bartle if you have access to one of those. Also, note that as a notational thing
<br /> \frac{\delta}{\delta g}<br />
usually denotes a functional derivative, while what you want is \partial, not \delta in LaTeX, like
<br /> \frac{\partial}{\partial t}<br />
 
Ok, thanks. Just needed to confirm that the statement was true (my physics textbook used it in a proof and never justified the statement, so I wanted to make sure)
 
This is only true though when the bounds (a & b) are held constant, correct? I mean, if they were a=u(x) and b=v(x), the limits couldn't be switched.
 
If the limits themselves are also functions of t, the theorem (called Leibniz integral rule, IIRC) is:

\frac {d} {dt} \int_{a(t)}^{b(t)} f(x,t) dx = f(b(t),t)\frac{d b}{d t}-f(a(t),t)\frac{d a}{d t}+\int_{a(t)}^{b(t)} \frac {\partial} {\partial t} f(x,t) dx

I know a sufficient condition for this to hold is that f be uniformly continuous in the region of interest.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K