Does the series converge for all values of x?

  • Thread starter Thread starter applegatecz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the convergence of the series \(\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} (x^k - x^{k-1})(x^k + x^{k-1})\) for various values of \(x\). Participants explore the implications of the geometric series formula and the behavior of the terms involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss simplifying the series and consider the convergence of individual terms. There is an attempt to factor the expression and analyze the implications of the factors on convergence. Questions arise about the validity of convergence at specific values of \(x\), particularly around \(|x| \leq 1\).

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with participants providing hints and clarifications. Some guidance has been offered regarding factoring and simplifying the expression, but there is no explicit consensus on the convergence criteria yet. Multiple interpretations of the series and its behavior are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of the series without a complete understanding of the convergence criteria, and there are indications of confusion regarding the setup of the problem and the nature of the terms involved.

applegatecz
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find all x for which [tex]\sum[/tex] from k=1 to infinity (x^k - x^(k-1))(x^k+x^(k-1)) converges.


Homework Equations


I think the geometric series formula is relevant: [tex]\sum[/tex] k=N to infinity of x^k = 1/(1-x) for all |x|<1.


The Attempt at a Solution


I simplified the expression to x^2k - x^(2k-2). I can show that the first term converges (I think ... because it is the product of two convergent sequences?), and I understand logically why the second term converges, but not sure how to show rigorously. I also think that the series converges for all |x|<1, but again not sure how to construct the proof.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: Factor x(k-1) out.
 
But then x^2 is one of the factors, and x^2 does not converge (?).
 
You are summing over k, not over x.

Hint number 2: your guess for the values of x where the series converges is almost right, but not quite.
 
Ah, I see, thank you. In this case, unlike the "regular" geometric series case, x can be less than one OR one (i.e., |x|<=1), because if x is one, x^2k and x^(2k-1) are both one ... so the series converges to zero. Correct?
 
applegatecz said:
Ah, I see, thank you. In this case, unlike the "regular" geometric series case, x can be less than one OR one (i.e., |x|<=1), because if x is one, x^2k and x^(2k-1) are both one ... so the series converges to zero. Correct?

Yes, it converges at x = 1. But if you follow my hint and factor out x(k-1) in your original expression, there won't be any k left in the summand. What does that tell you?
 
OK, I think I understand: the expression factors to x^(k-1)*[x^(k-1)-x^(k-1)] = 0?
 
In the summation you started with

[tex]\frac {x^k - x^{k-1}}{x^k+x^{k-1}}[/tex]

It's a fraction now, and it will be a fraction after you factor x(k-1) out and simplify it. Do that and simplify it. What do you get?
 
There is no fraction in the original summation.
 
  • #10
applegatecz said:
There is no fraction in the original summation.

Woops! Sorry, I misread the problem.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K