DOes the trace determine the Hamiltonian

  • Thread starter tpm
  • Start date
  • #1
tpm
72
0
if we define Z as:

[tex] Z(s)=Tr[exp(-sH)] [/tex]

my 2 questions are..

a) is the trace unique and define the Hamiltonian completely? i mean if

we have 2 Hamiltonians H and K then [tex] Tr[exp(-sH)]\ne Tr[exp(-sK) [/tex]

and if we use the 'Semiclassical approach' then [tex] Z(s)=Tr[exp(-sH)]\sim As^{-1/2}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx exp(-sV(x)) [/tex]

then given Z(s) we could calculate approximately V(x) by solving an integral equation.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
223
2
1 + 2 + 3 = 6
2 + 2 + 2 = 6

Both of these could be the diagonal elements of a hamiltonian. Clearly the trace alone is not sufficient to categorize the entire hamiltonian. You get no information about the off-diagonal elements, too, which is relevant since you have not necessarily taken the trace in a basis which diagonalizes the hamiltonian.
 
  • #3
vanesch
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
5,028
17
As Statmechguy points out, the trace isn't sufficient to know the hamiltonian. However, the function Z(s), being a function of s, will allow you (by derivatives for instance) to find all individual diagonal elements of H.
 
  • #4
tpm
72
0
Well..since the trace is just the sum of 'Eigenvalues' of a Hamiltonian, considering every Hamiltonian has an infinite number of 'energies'.. perhaps the trace is unique (in this case since Statsmechguay has only pointed a finite-dimensional case), could it Happen that both H and K had the same energies but different potential V(x) ??
 

Related Threads on DOes the trace determine the Hamiltonian

Replies
12
Views
9K
Replies
13
Views
725
Replies
23
Views
11K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
571
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
3K
Top