Does this set of polynomials span P3?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mitch_1211
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomials Set Span
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around whether a specific set of polynomials spans the vector space P3. Participants explore methods for determining this, including matrix setups and alternative definitions involving coefficients of polynomials.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant, Mitch, inquires about how to set up a system for polynomials similar to a vector matrix to determine if the set spans P3.
  • Another participant explains that the situation is analogous to vectors, suggesting that the basis can be represented in terms of polynomial coefficients.
  • There is a clarification on augmenting the matrix with polynomial coefficients, confirming that it follows the same principles as with vectors.
  • A different approach is proposed, where the set of polynomials spans P3 if certain equations involving coefficients can be solved, leading to a system of equations that must be satisfied.
  • Participants acknowledge that solving the system of equations can revert to using a matrix of coefficients.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the methods for determining if the set of polynomials spans P3, but there are multiple approaches discussed without a consensus on which is preferable.

Contextual Notes

Participants do not explicitly resolve the methods or the implications of their approaches, leaving some assumptions about the nature of the polynomials and the conditions for spanning unaddressed.

mitch_1211
Messages
95
Reaction score
1
hey i want to find out if the set
s = {t2-2t , t3+8 , t3-t2 , t2-4} spans P3

For vectors, i would setup a matrix (v1 v2 v3 v4 .. vn | x) where x is a column vector (x , y ,z .. etc) and reduce the system. If a solution exists then the vectors span the space, if there are no solutions then the space spanned is either the line or plane made up of the x , y ,z = 0

My question is, how do u setup a similar system for polynomials?

i know that the colums would be
t3
t2
t
1

and then put in the polynomials like (p1 p2 p3 p4 .. ) but what do i augment this matrix with?

many thanks

mitch
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

It is an identical situation. Rather than having a vector (w,x,y,z)=w \mathbf{i} + x\mathbf{j}+y\mathbf{k}+z\mathbf{l}, you have a vector (w,x,y,z)=w 1 +x t + y t^2 +z t^3. The \mathbf{i},\mathbf{j},\mathbf{k},\mathbf{l} and the 1,t,t^2,t^3 are standard basis vectors, and the w,x,y,z are components. In this notation, your basis is \{(0,-2,1,0),(8,0,0,1),(0,0,-1,1),(-4,0,1,0)\}, a trivial change which hopefully brings you into familiar territory!
 
So after I've got the basis vectors you have described, I augment them in a matrix with w,x,y,z just like for usual vectors?
 
mitch_1211 said:
So after I've got the basis vectors you have described, I augment them in a matrix with w,x,y,z just like for usual vectors?

Yes!
 
Another way to do this, without directly using matrices, is to use the definition:
The set \{t^2-2t , t^3+8 , t^3-t^2 , t^2-4\} spans P3 if and only if, for any a, b, c, d there exist \alpha, \beta, \gamma, \delta such that
\alpha(t^2- 2t)+ \beta(t^3+ 8)+ \gamma(t^3- t^2)+ \delta(t^2- 4)= at^3+ bt^2+ ct+ d
which is the same as
(\beta+ \gamma)t^3+ (\alpha- \gamma+ \delta)t^2- (2\alpha+ \gamma- \delta)t+ (8\beta- 4\delta)= at^3+ bt^2+ ct+ d
That gives the four equations
\beta+ \gamma= a
\alpha- \gamma+ \delta= b
2\alpha+ \gamma- \delta= c
8\beta- 4\delta= d

The set spans the space if and only if it is possible to solve for \alpha, \beta, \gamma, and \delta in terms of any numbers, a, b, c, and d.

Of course, solving that system of equations could be done in terms of the matrix of coefficients which gets right back to your method!
\beta+ \gam,
 
micromass said:
Yes!

Perfect, thank you!
 
HallsofIvy said:
Of course, solving that system of equations could be done in terms of the matrix of coefficients which gets right back to your method!

Thanks for explaining that, much appreciated.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
9K
Replies
18
Views
5K