Does this theorem have a name?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter techmologist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The theorem discussed relates to the integral of the cross product of the unit tangent vector and the unit normal vector over a curve C, equating it to the integral of the mean curvature H over the surface S. Specifically, the equation is expressed as \int_{C} \mathbf{t} \times \mathbf{n}ds = -2\int_{S} H \mathbf{n}da. This result can be derived using Stokes' theorem and involves the vector identity \nabla \times (\mathbf{a} \times \mathbf{b}). The mean curvature H is defined as half the trace of the second fundamental form B, leading to the conclusion that \int_C \mathbf{t} \times \mathbf{n} ds = \int_S 2H \mathbf{n} da.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Stokes' theorem
  • Familiarity with vector calculus identities
  • Knowledge of mean curvature and its mathematical definition
  • Basic concepts of differential geometry
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Stokes' theorem in depth
  • Learn about vector calculus identities and their applications
  • Explore the properties of mean curvature in differential geometry
  • Investigate the second fundamental form and its significance in geometry
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students of differential geometry who are interested in the relationships between curvature, surface integrals, and vector calculus.

techmologist
Messages
313
Reaction score
12
For a surface S bounded by a curve C,

\int_{C} \mathbf{t} \times \mathbf{n}ds = -2\int_{S} H \mathbf{n}da

t is the unit tangent to C, and n is the unit normal to the surface S. H is the mean curvature of S. It can be derived from Stokes' theorem, but it seems like the kind of result that might have been known earlier.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For any constant vector c,

\mathbf{c} \cdot \int_C \mathbf{t} \times \mathbf{n} ds = \int_C (\mathbf{n} \times \mathbf{c}) \cdot \mathbf{t} ds =\int_S \nabla \times (\mathbf{n} \times \mathbf{c}) \cdot \mathbf{n}da

Using the vector identity

\nabla \times (\mathbf{a} \times \mathbf{b}) = \mathbf{b} \cdot \nabla \mathbf{a} - \mathbf{a} \cdot \nabla \mathbf{b} - (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{a} ) \mathbf{b} + (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{b} )\mathbf{a}

and the fact that c is constant, the above integral becomes

\int_S [\mathbf{c}\cdot \nabla \mathbf{n} - (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{n})\mathbf{c} ] \cdot \mathbf{n} da <br /> =<br /> \mathbf{c} \cdot \int_S (\nabla \mathbf{n} ) \cdot \mathbf{n} - (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{n }) \mathbf{n} da

The first term in the integrand is zero, since it is just the gradient of the length of the unit normal. Also, since the vector c was arbitrary, its dot product with the integral can be dropped:


\int_C \mathbf{t} \times \mathbf{n} ds = -\int_S (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{n} ) \mathbf{n} da

Depending on how you define the normal (outward or inward), div n = -2H up to a sign*. So that gives the result

\int_C \mathbf{t} \times \mathbf{n} ds = \int_S 2H \mathbf{n} da

I had an extra minus sign in the first post.


* The mean curvature H of a surface is equal to half the trace of the second fundamental form B: 2H = gjkbjk. The components of the second fundamental form can be defined as

b_{jk} = -\mathbf{x}_j \cdot \mathbf{n}_{,k} = -\mathbf{x}_j \cdot \mathbf{n}_{,k} = - n^i_{{ };k}\mathbf{x}_j \cdot \mathbf{x}_i = -n^i_{{ };k}g_{ij}

Multiplying both sides by the inverse of g_ij and then summing the diagonal elements gives

g^{jk}b_{jk} = - n^k_{{ };k} = -\nabla \cdot \mathbf{n}
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K