High School Does "wave–particle duality" exist in low frequency waves?

Click For Summary
Wave-particle duality is considered an outdated concept in modern physics, having been replaced by quantum mechanics as articulated by Dirac. There is no theoretical minimum frequency for electromagnetic radiation to exhibit particle behavior; it is primarily a technological challenge to detect individual photons at lower frequencies. The discussion highlights that electromagnetic waves, regardless of frequency, can theoretically be absorbed as discrete energy packets by physical systems. The idea that there should be a sudden change in behavior based on wavelength is dismissed, emphasizing continuity in electromagnetic interactions. Overall, the conversation underscores the complexities of understanding low-frequency electromagnetic waves in the context of quantum mechanics.
Dante Meira
Messages
22
Reaction score
5
Hello, I'm new to the forum, and Physics is not my area of study, but I have a doubt that I couldn't find a satisfactory answer on Google, so I created this account in this forum just to ask this, because I'm really curious to know the answer to this doubt.

Does "wave–particle duality" exist in low frequency waves? For example, the electromagnetic radiation used in the "long-wave" radio AM broadcast, can "manifest" this wave–particle duality? Or the Extremely low frequency (ELF) radio waves, with frequencies from 3 to 30 Hz, do they manifest wave–particle duality as well?

In other words, my doubt is: is there a minimum frequency of electromagnetic radiation for the "particle behavior" to be possible to be experimentally detected?

I could also extend the question and ask if there is a maximum frequency of electromagnetic radiation for it to be capable of behaving like a particle?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can think of a system where an elementary particle is trapped in a relatively large potential well, so that the spacing between its energy levels would be low enough for it to absorb radio frequency photons. Radio waves are also used in nuclear spin resonance spectroscopy, where the direction of the spin of a nucleus can change when it absorbs photons of low energy.
 
hilbert2 said:
You can think of a system where an elementary particle is trapped in a relatively large potential well, so that the spacing between its energy levels would be low enough for it to absorb radio frequency photons. Radio waves are also used in nuclear spin resonance spectroscopy, where the direction of the spin of a nucleus can change when it absorbs photons of low energy.

Thank you.

Is there any theoretical minimum limit of frequency for the photons of low energy to actually interact as photons, that is, as particles?

For example, if someone creates electromagnetic radiation in the form of radio waves with a frequency of only 0.1 hertz (1 deci-hertz), can the low energy photons associated to those waves actually interact as particles?
 
There can't be a sudden change in the laws of nature when going below some length- or timescale, e.g. electromagnetic waves behaving in one way if they have a wavelength of ##\lambda \geq 1 ##m and suddenly in another way if ##\lambda < 1##m. In principle, EM waves of any frequency can be absorbed as discrete energy packets by some physical system.

If you consider the spacings between translational motion energy levels in an ideal gas that is confined in a macroscopic container, you'll see that the corresponding photon wavelengths can be of the order of magnitude of light years.
 
Last edited:
Interesting theoretical question. I have never thought about a single photon emitting antenna at very long wavelengths in the hundreds of km range. Be a neat receiving antenna.
 
Dante Meira said:
In other words, my doubt is: is there a minimum frequency of electromagnetic radiation for the "particle behavior" to be possible to be experimentally detected?.

Well first the wave particle duality doesn't exist - its an outmoded idea done away with when Dirac came up with his transformation theory (which generally goes by the name QM today), at the end of 1926, but probably sooner.

But to answer the above - no there isn't - its purely a technological issue just how long an EM wavelength can be before you can detect individual photons, theory places no limits at all.

This may seem strange because in beginner texts and popularizations the wave particle duality is of invoked to explain the double slit. Its not really a good explanation - here is a much better one:
https://arxiv.org/ftp/quant-ph/papers/0703/0703126.pdf

Thanks
Bill
 
I am slowly going through the book 'What Is a Quantum Field Theory?' by Michel Talagrand. I came across the following quote: One does not" prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics. The ultimate test for a model is the agreement of its predictions with experiments. Although it may seem trite, it does fit in with my modelling view of QM. The more I think about it, the more I believe it could be saying something quite profound. For example, precisely what is the justification of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
8K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K