Does WHIM solve the dark matter problem?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter fabinuk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dark matter Matter
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the warm-hot intergalactic medium (WHIM) and its insufficiency in addressing the dark matter problem. Recent observations indicate that WHIM, while detectable in galaxy clusters via X-rays, constitutes only a minor fraction of the mass required to maintain the gravitational cohesion of these clusters. The consensus is that WHIM cannot account for the totality of dark matter in the universe, as evidenced by the bullet cluster, which serves as a critical observational counterexample.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of warm-hot intergalactic medium (WHIM)
  • Familiarity with X-ray astronomy techniques
  • Knowledge of galaxy cluster dynamics
  • Awareness of dark matter theories and concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the observational characteristics of the bullet cluster
  • Study the role of X-rays in detecting WHIM in galaxy clusters
  • Explore alternative theories of dark matter beyond WHIM
  • Investigate the implications of WHIM on cosmic structure formation
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and researchers focused on cosmic structure, dark matter theories, and the dynamics of galaxy clusters will benefit from this discussion.

fabinuk
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Does the Observation of whim can solved the problem of dark matter
Direct Observation of Whim (The warm–hot intergalactic medium) has known a lot progress recently. Does whim could be enough to amount to the quantity of dark matters in the universe, therefore solving the dark matter problem? If not, why?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Short answer: no, for many reasons. First, there isn't enough of it. We can see this matter quite clearly in galaxy clusters through x-rays, and it only amounts to a small fraction of what is required to hold the galaxy clusters together.

There's lots of other reasons why this can't work, but that's the start of it. I recommend looking up the bullet cluster for a pretty direct observational example that rules this out directly.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ohwilleke, vanhees71, jim mcnamara and 2 others

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K