Does xn Converge? A Comparison Test

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The series xn = 1/(n + SQRTn diverges as established through the comparison test. The user separated the series into two fractions, 1/SQRTn and 1/(1 + SQRTn), both of which diverge due to their power being less than one. The conclusion is reinforced by the divergence of the harmonic series, which confirms that multiplying by a non-zero constant does not affect divergence. This analysis clarifies the behavior of the series in question.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of series convergence and divergence
  • Familiarity with the comparison test in calculus
  • Knowledge of harmonic series properties
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the comparison test in more depth
  • Explore the properties of the harmonic series
  • Learn about other convergence tests such as the ratio test and root test
  • Practice problems involving series convergence and divergence
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians focusing on series analysis, and anyone seeking to understand convergence tests in mathematical series.

Mattofix
Messages
137
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Does xn converge (Sum from n=1 to infinity) of xn = 1/(n + SQRTn)

Homework Equations



Using comparision test

The Attempt at a Solution



I separted into fractions of 1/SQRTn - 1/(1 + SQRTn) and i know that both of these diverge since the power of n is less than one but am stuck as to whether is converges or diverges and how to prove it...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\frac{1}{n+n}\leq \frac{1}{n+\sqrt{n}}
 
therefore xn divereges...?
 
yeah that is right, since the harmonic series diverges, it also diverges when we multiply it by a constant.
 
sutupidmath said:
yeah that is right, since the harmonic series diverges, it also diverges when we multiply it by a constant.
Non-zero constant.

Not to offend you but that is what I like to call a "physics-type mistake".
 
Kummer said:
Non-zero constant.

Not to offend you but that is what I like to call a "physics-type mistake".

yeah that is what i actually meant, but thnx for pointing it out. and not am not offended in any way.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K