DoF of a Gauge Boson - Why Only 1 for Virtual Photons?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ismaili
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Boson Dof Gauge
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the degrees of freedom (DoF) of photons, specifically addressing the discrepancy between real and virtual photons. In Quantum Electrodynamics (QED), the physical DoF for a real photon is established as 2 through gauge fixing, particularly using the Lorentz gauge condition \partial_\mu A^\mu = 0. However, virtual photons, which appear in Feynman diagrams, possess an additional longitudinal component, leading to the conclusion that only one DoF can be gauged away for these particles. This difference is attributed to the mathematical nature of virtual photons and the gauge artifacts involved in their treatment.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Electrodynamics (QED)
  • Familiarity with gauge fixing techniques
  • Knowledge of Feynman diagrams and their interpretation
  • Basic concepts of quantum field theory (QFT)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study gauge fixing methods in Quantum Electrodynamics (QED)
  • Learn about the role of longitudinal components in virtual particles
  • Explore the implications of gauge artifacts in quantum field theory
  • Investigate the differences between physical and unphysical Hilbert spaces in QFT
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, quantum field theorists, and students studying Quantum Electrodynamics, particularly those interested in the nuances of gauge theory and particle interactions.

ismaili
Messages
150
Reaction score
0
As we know, the number of physical degrees of freedom(DoF) for a photon is 2.

I can understand this by gauging away redundant DoF's by gauge fixing.

For example, in QED, by fixing the Lorentz gauge \partial_\mu A^\mu = 0,

we could get rid of one DoF, moreover, the residual gauge symmetry, which is

A^\mu \rightarrow A^\mu + \partial^\mu f(x)

with \partial^2 f = 0 could allow us to remove another DoF.

This means the physical DoF of a photon is 2.

------

However, on the other hand, we know that the virtual photon

which appearing in the internal legs of Feynman diagrams could have some longitudinal component.

And this longitudinal DoF could interact with other particles in a Feynman diagram.

However, this means the above symmetry argument in the first part of my post could NOT apply

to virtual photons. I don't know why. We could always gauge away two DoF's,

however, consideration of Feynman diagrams says that we could only gauge away 1 DoF of

virtual particles, why is that?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi ismaili! :smile:

virtual photons aren't real

they're mathematical inventions with an extra degree of freedom :wink:
 
In QED you can fix the gauge in such a way that only the two physical polarizations do survive. I like the A°=0 and div A = 0 gauge better b/c A° is unphysical (its conjugate momentum is zero and it therefore acts as a Lagrange multiplier generating the Gauss law). Once you chose this gauge A° has been eliminated by constrcution and you can solve the Gauss law such that unphysical (longitudinal) polarizations are restricted to an unphysical Hilbert space which is (and remains under time evolution) orthogonal to the physical Hilbert space.

Constructing the physical, gauge-fixed Hamiltonian you only see two polarizations.

I know that in standard QFT textbooks this gauge is rarely discussed as Lorentz covariance is no longer visible and has to be checked for explicitly in all the calulations. Nevertheless it is useful in order to study physical degrees of freedom. In QCD you can show that both longitudinal gluons and even ghosts are absent in such physical gauges.

So the reason behind different number of degrees of freedom is a gauge artefact only.

http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994AnPhy.233...17L
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K