Donnan equilibrium and electroneutrality

  • Thread starter Thread starter a b
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equilibrium
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concepts of Gibbs-Donnan equilibrium and electroneutrality in solutions separated by a membrane. Participants explore the implications of charge distribution and potential differences in systems involving permeable and impermeable ions, as well as the conditions under which electroneutrality may or may not hold at equilibrium.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a scenario involving two compartments with permeable and impermeable ions, questioning whether electroneutrality holds at equilibrium.
  • Another participant suggests that potential differences indicate charge separation, implying that solutions may not be neutral despite the assumption of electroneutrality being sometimes valid.
  • A participant expresses confusion over the relationship between potential difference and charge distribution, noting that while the bulk solution may be neutral, charge exists near the membrane.
  • It is proposed that the electroneutrality principle is useful for calculating molar concentrations, but the actual charge differences contributing to potential differences are negligible.
  • A university teacher's explanation is referenced, indicating that while charges exist, they are small enough to be ignored in practical calculations.
  • Participants acknowledge similarities in their understandings and explanations, indicating a shared perspective on the concepts discussed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants appear to agree on the notion that while electroneutrality is a useful approximation, the presence of potential differences suggests some level of charge exists. However, there is no consensus on the implications of this charge or the conditions under which electroneutrality may be considered valid.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the charge distribution is localized near the membrane, and the implications of this distribution on the overall electroneutrality of the compartments remain a point of discussion. The relationship between microscopic charge distribution and bulk electroneutrality is not fully resolved.

a b
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I've heard that when you are considering a Gibbs-Donnan equilibrium, that is if you have for example a situation like this:

There are two compartments 1 and 2 divided by a membrane, and at the beginning you have:
In compartment 1 a neutral solution of permeable ions H+ and Cl-;
In compartment 2 a neutral solution of permeable ions H+ and an anion that is impermeable to the membrane;
water can pass through the membrane.

I've read that not only at the beginning but also at equilibrium each compartment is electrically neutral.

Let's suppose now to have another situation: you have two solutions of NaCl at different concentrations, and between them a membrane that let's through only Na+ and not water nor Cl-.
In this case does the electroneutrality hold when the system is at equilibrium too? if not, why?
Thank you
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I am not sure I understand what you are asking about. In such systems we observe a potential difference between separated cells, this potential difference has it source in a charge separation, so solutions are not neutral. However, charges are very small, so depending on what you are trying to calculate, assumption that solutions are electroneutral can be right - or wrong.
 
That is the same i thought: if there is potential difference, the two compartments must be charged; but i read in many places that in a Donnan equilibrium the potential difference is given only by microscopic charge distribution, in a order of a Debye length, while the whole compartments are neutral...I really can't understand...
 
No contradiction here - solution is bulk is electroneutral, as charge is present only very close to the membrane. So if you look at whole volume - it is charged. If you look at a thin layer of the solution close to the membrane, it is charged, as that's where the charge resides. But if you look at the whole volume minus this layer, it is electroneutral.
 
Ok thank you. So what you just said applies to both Nernst and Donnan equilibria?
 
I've just asked a university teacher and he gave me an answer that I think is very explanatory and clear.
He said that, since there is a potential difference between the compartments, actually a charge do exist inside each compartment, but it is a so small amount that it can be ignored. Effectively, the electroneutrality principle is used to calculate molar concentrations of ions , but the excess (or lack) of ions needed to build up the commonly considered potential differences is many (tens) orders of magnitude below any concentration we use in our calculations...
 
I have a feeling he said exactly the same thing I wrote :smile:
 
You are right: you said it quite clearly in the first post you wrote. I've realized just now. I'm sorry, but for some reason I don't know, I missed the point of your explanation the first time I read it..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K