Double ball drop and conservation of momentum

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two balls of different masses dropped simultaneously, focusing on the conditions under which the larger ball comes to a stop after colliding with the smaller ball. The problem is situated within the context of conservation of momentum and elastic collisions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the justification for applying conservation of momentum in the presence of gravitational forces, questioning whether the impulse approximation allows for neglecting gravity during the brief collision period. There is also inquiry into the nature of the collisions and the implications of the final velocity of the larger ball being zero.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants seeking clarification on the assumptions made regarding gravitational forces and the application of momentum conservation. Some guidance has been provided regarding the treatment of gravity during the collision, but no consensus has been reached on the justification for the approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity introduced by the gravitational field and the non-closed nature of the system, which raises questions about the validity of using the impulse approximation in this scenario.

stfz
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The classic double ball drop question: a ball of mass m is placed directly above another ball of mass M, and assume that m is not negligible. Both balls are dropped simultaneously. Find the mass m such that, upon the second collision (m with M), M has a final velocity of zero.

Homework Equations


Conservation of momentum
Elastic collision assumed.

The Attempt at a Solution


Here, probably my only question is how to justify applying conservation of momentum to the collision. My reasoning is that conservation of momentum shouldn't apply because there is an external force on the two-ball system (gravitation). However, from what I know of the 'impulse approximation', we can treat the background forces (i.e. gravity) as negligible given that the collision occurs across a very short period of time? We can then work with momentum conservation over an infinitesimal time interval? (i.e. the effects of gravitational acceleration on momentum of the system may then be ignored)
Is that the correct reason for why it may be applied? Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You refer to a second collision being between the two balls. What is the first collision?

Also, if the final velocity of M is zero and it's in a gravitational field, it must be supported by something. What is supporting it?
 
Sorry about that. Here's the full question:
A small ball of mass m is aligned above a larger ball of mass M (with slight separation) and the two are dropped simultaneously from a height h. Assume the radius of each ball is negligible relative to h.
(a) If the larger ball rebounds elastically from the floor and then the small ball rebounds elastically from the larger ball, what value of m would result in stopping the larger ball when it collides with the small ball?

My questions were as above - in this non-closed system (force of gravitation), are we using the impulse approximation to make gravitational forces negligible relative to the collision forces? The method of solving this question (according to a Google) is to equate momentum. I'm personally inclined to doing that too, but I need to be able to justify it.

Thanks!
 
stfz said:
My questions were as above - in this non-closed system (force of gravitation), are we using the impulse approximation to make gravitational forces negligible relative to the collision forces? The method of solving this question (according to a Google) is to equate momentum. I'm personally inclined to doing that too, but I need to be able to justify it.
Yes, the collisions are presumed to take an unknown but very short time, so gravity can be ignored for their duration.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: stfz
A much clearer version of this problem would be one in which the balls are masses sliding collinearly on a frictionless surface and M then undergoes an elastic collision at right angles to a wall. That takes gravity out of the equation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: stfz
Yes this makes sense. Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
335
Views
17K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
5K