Double blind peer review winners and losers

[atyy]

Double blind peer review is standard in medical journals.

It is not totally standard. According to https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5213965/#CR7, JAMA, NEJM and Lancet are single blind.

BMJ does open reviews https://bmjopen.bmj.com/pages/reviewerguidelines/.

 

[Dale]

It is not totally standard.

Well, all of the standard journals in my sub-field use it.

 

[atyy]

Well, all of the standard journals in my sub-field use it.

What is your sub-field?

 

[Dr. Courtney]

I've been so thorough in several reviews that the authors figured out who it was (or at least narrowed it down to my wife or me).

Our expertise is unique.

 

[MathematicalPhysicist]

You would lose too, since you wouldn't be able to write a paper about ER=EPR

So if $ER\ne 0$ then $P=1$?! :-D

Assuming commutativity of $P$ with either $E$ or $R$.