Double Major in Physics and What?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the employability of various double major combinations involving physics, particularly comparing physics with math, chemistry, and engineering. Participants explore the implications of different combinations on job prospects and academic paths, considering both undergraduate and potential graduate studies.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the employability of a double major in physics and math versus physics and chemistry, seeking opinions on the best combination.
  • Another participant suggests that a double major in physics and engineering is the most employable option if job prospects are the primary concern.
  • A different participant expresses concern about becoming too specialized in undergrad and values the broad options that a physics major provides.
  • One participant argues that since chemistry is applied physics and physics is applied math, a double major in math and physics is more employable for physicists, while a strong physics background is beneficial for chemists.
  • Another participant emphasizes that combinations like physics with non-science majors (e.g., English, communications, business) could be more appealing to employers due to the well-rounded skill set they suggest.
  • One participant shares a personal perspective, stating they would choose a second major based on personal interest rather than employability, indicating a preference for diverse academic backgrounds.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the most employable double major combinations, with no consensus reached on a single best option. Some prioritize technical combinations, while others value interdisciplinary approaches.

Contextual Notes

Participants' opinions reflect varying assumptions about the job market and the relevance of different fields of study, with no definitive evidence provided to support claims about employability.

zoiberg137
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Just wondering if I get get some opinions on what is thought to be more "employable", a double major in physics and math, or physics and chemistry?

Or if there's another combination you would like to recommend, feel free!

Some sources online say physics is a great thing to major in with the need for science related graduates right now...Other sources say physics is as "worthless" as philosophy. Whatever. So, I figure a double major, if i can pull it off, would be better than one in terms of finding a job after school. (although I guess I should add that I have every intention of getting a masters, maybe even phd eventually, but I won't try to decide which subject until I have my undergrad degree figured out...) And if I could get a job in the field WHILE pursuing a masters, that would be great...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you only care about empoyability, then a double major in physics and engineering is best.
 
Hmm, haven't considered that... I've always considered engineering to be an option for grad school. I was afraid of getting too specialized in a field during undergrad years then deciding I want to do something else. That's why I kind of like physics, I feel like it will provide a large number of options...
 
*bump
 
Since chemistry is applied physics and physics is applied math, I'd say getting a double in math and physics is more employable, at least for physicists. You don't need to know chemistry to do physics, so it would be irrelevant to take all of those classes if you want to be a physicist. However, if you want to be a chemist, having a strong physics background would look great, just as having a strong mathematical background looks great for physicists.
 
I agree that engineering is good for employent at the bachelors level, so are biochemistry, molecular biology and similar majors. If I were hiring, resumes with degree combinations like physics/English, physics/communications, physics/business would catch my attention and generate more interest than a science/math or double science major. The reason is that it's hard to find well rounded individuals who can function and communicate well in a more or less professional environment. Physics/art, physics/philosophy, physics/anthropology, and many others would be similarly impressive to me, as indicative of a person's diversity of interests and abilities. That being said, if I were back in undergrad, I would pick a second major based almost entirely on what I like to study most (no way would I ever pick business or communications, although I can certainly respect folks who like those fields). Just my opinion though.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K