Double Slit Exp: Electron 1 at a Time, Detector Not Detecting

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of using a detector in a double-slit experiment with electrons, particularly when the detector does not record any results. Participants explore the relationship between detection, decoherence, and the resulting interference pattern.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the interference pattern is destroyed if a detector is used but does not record results, suggesting that detection affects the outcome.
  • Another participant argues that the key factor is whether the detector decoheres the electron, implying that the interference pattern will be destroyed regardless of whether results are shown.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that if the detector does not show anything, the only way to verify its function is by observing the interference fringes, indicating a potential measurement efficiency aspect.
  • Further, a participant references a paper discussing the effects of which-path markers and quantum erasers, stating that the possibility of determining which slit the electron passed through can influence the interference pattern, even if no actual measurement is made.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the role of the detector and its impact on the interference pattern, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without consensus.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the precise mechanisms of how detectors cause decoherence and the implications of measurement in quantum mechanics. The discussion also touches on the experimental setup and its relevance to understanding these concepts.

lnsanity
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
What happen if I send electron 1 at a time and I use a detector but my detector don't show result neither record it (I setup it that way)? I presume the interference pattern is destroyed since the detector detect in which slit the electron go ? Do I am correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's got nothing to do if the detector shows or not shows a result - rather if it decoheres the photon or not. The interference pattern will be destroyed.

Thanks
Bill
 
If the detector does not show anything, the only way to know if it is really a detector is to look at the fringes!

You may consider the setup "detector + screen as a setup used to measure the efficiency of the detector.
 
How the detector work ? Precisely what in the detector makes the electron decoheres or not ?
 
I strongly recommend a recent paper in AJP that practically addressed all of this issue: Rueckner and Peidle, Am. J. Phys. v.81, p.951 (2013).

The Introduction describes the experiment being reported:

... In particular, the demonstration has been expanded to include a which-path marker and a quantum eraser - one can erase the which-path information to recover interference. The act of measurement and the design of the experiment affect what is being measured. Even if not actually measured, the mere possibility that an observer could determine which slit the photo passed through causes the interference pattern to switch to non-interference...

So even if one doesn't actually look at the measurement, the mere fact that one can actually do that after the fact is sufficient to affect the outcome of the result.

Note that this setup being reported are suitable for advanced undergraduate labs. This demo has become THAT common.

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
971
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K