B Double slit experiment for layman

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
555
In the literature we are told that the double slit experiment works but are given no description of the experiment apparatus
How big are the slits, how far apart are they, or does it matter
Would using 3 slits make a difference, would photon go through A and B, or through B and C, or all 3.
When going through 2 slits is the photon energy halved or doubled., or the same. That would have me scratching my head.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • Like
Likes DrChinese
wolram said:
In the literature we are told that the double slit experiment works but are given no description of the experiment apparatus
How big are the slits, how far apart are they, or does it matter
If you google for "practical double-slit experiment" you will find a number of good descriptions.
Would using 3 slits make a difference, would photon go through A and B, or through B and C, or all 3.
When going through 2 slits is the photon energy halved or doubled., or the same. That would have me scratching my head.
Don't be thinking as if the particle is going through both slits (or all three, in a triple-slit experiment). You'll hear it described that way in some popularizations, but that model is very misleading.

What's really going on: We calculate the probability of the particle landing at any point on the screen by summing the probability amplitudes for every possible path between the source and the screen. If there are two slits, there are two possible paths. If there are three slits, there are three possible paths... and so on. But this calculation isn't saying anything about which path the particle follows and it certainly isn't saying that the particle divides into pieces and goes through more than one path.

(If we put a detector in one of the slits, then we know to not count the path through that slit if the detector doesn't trigger, and to count only that path if it does trigger. But the general principle is the same - we're adding the probability amplitudes for all the possible paths between the source and the screen).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes wolram
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top