A Double-Slit Experiment: Momentum & Position

Click For Summary
In the double-slit experiment, there is a defined relationship between the momentum of a particle after passing through the slit and its position on the screen, described by Schrödinger's Equation for non-relativistic massive particles. To derive the probability density function for position from a given momentum function, one must solve Schrödinger's Equation while considering specific boundary conditions. This process can be complex and may require approximation techniques for particular scenarios. The discussed momentum probability density function is based on a formula from Uffink and Hilgevoord (1985). Understanding this relationship is crucial for analyzing quantum behavior in the experiment.
Ad VanderVen
Messages
169
Reaction score
13
TL;DR
In the double-slit experiment with two open slits, is there a fixed relationship between the momentum (p) of the particle immediately after passing through the slit and the position (q) of the impact on the screen?
In the double-slit experiment with two open slits, is there a fixed relationship between the momentum (p) of the particle immediately after passing through the slit and the position (q) of the impact on the screen?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. The relationship is called Schrodinger's Equation for a non-relativistc massive particle.
If you wish a more specific answer you will need to formulate a more specific question.
 
My specific question is, that I have a formula for the probability density function of the momentum (p) of the particle immediately after it passes through the slit in the double-slit experiment with two open slits and I want to derive from that formula a formula for the probability density function of the position (q) of the impact on the screen?
 
Then you need to solve Schrodinger to match your specific boundary conditions in time and space. This will likely be very difficult.
There are many approximation techniques that are useful for particular situations. What does your formula look like?
 
It is formula (11) from Uffink and Hilgevoord. (1985):

$$\begin{align}
\phi \left(p \right) \, = \, \frac{\sqrt{2}~\sqrt{\frac{a }{\pi }}~\cos \left(A ~p \right)~\sin \left(a ~p \right)}{a ~p }
\end{align}$$

Reference

Uffink, J.B.M. and Hilgevoord, J. (1985). Uncertainty Principle and Uncertainty Relations. Foundations of Physics, Vol. 15, No. 9,
 
Last edited:
An antilinear operator ##\hat{A}## can be considered as, ##\hat{A}=\hat{L}\hat{K}##, where ##\hat{L}## is a linear operator and ##\hat{K} c=c^*## (##c## is a complex number). In the Eq. (26) of the text https://bohr.physics.berkeley.edu/classes/221/notes/timerev.pdf the equality ##(\langle \phi |\hat{A})|\psi \rangle=[ \langle \phi|(\hat{A}|\psi \rangle)]^*## is given but I think this equation is not correct within a minus sign. For example, in the Hilbert space of spin up and down, having...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
55
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K