Doubt about a probability density

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the probability density functions related to the angle of a needle on a speedometer and its projection onto a horizontal line. Participants explore the reasoning behind the relationship between the angular probability density and the linear probability density, as well as the implications of different transformations on these densities.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that the probability density function for the angle ##\rho(\theta)## is given by ##\rho(\theta) = 1/\pi##, while expressing uncertainty about deriving the corresponding linear probability density ##\rho(x)##.
  • Another participant explains that the relationship ##\rho(\theta)d\theta = \rho'(x)dx## is based on the definition of probability density, indicating that the probability of landing in a specific range must be conserved.
  • Concerns are raised about the conservation of probability when projecting the angular range onto the x-axis, with one participant questioning how different intervals can maintain the same probability.
  • A participant suggests that the physical reality of probability should not depend on the system used, implying that if the intervals differ, the densities must adjust accordingly to conserve probability.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the density functions are not the same and must transform appropriately, providing a mathematical derivation of the relationship between the angular and linear densities.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the conservation of probability during the transformation from angular to linear density. While some agree on the necessity of adjusting densities to maintain probability, others challenge the reasoning behind the transformation and its implications.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various assumptions about the relationships between the angle and its projection, as well as the mathematical transformations involved. Some participants introduce specific mappings and transformations, but these remain unresolved in terms of their implications for probability density.

Kaguro
Messages
221
Reaction score
57
I was trying a problem from Griffith's Introduction to QM. The problem was:

The needle on a broken car speedometer is free to swing, and bounces perfectly off the pins at either end, so that if you give it a flick it is equally likely to come to rest at any angle between 0 to ##\pi##.

a)Find probability density ##\rho##(##\theta##).
b)If x is the projection of needle on the horizontal line and r is length of needle, then find probability density ##\rho##(x)
----------------------------------------------------------
The first one is simply:
##\rho##(##\theta##)##d\theta## = ##d\theta##/##\pi##
so, ##\rho##(##\theta##) = 1/##\pi##

I couldn't do the b part. So I looked at the solution and it says:
##\rho##(##\theta##)##d\theta## = ##\rho##(x)dx

Why? Can you please tell me the reasoning?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kaguro said:
I couldn't do the b part. So I looked at the solution and it says:
##\rho##(##\theta##)##d\theta## = ##\rho##(x)dx

Why? Can you please tell me the reasoning?

That's the definition of probability density. If we take a small angular range ##(\theta, \theta + d \theta)##, then the probability the needle lands in that range is ##\rho(\theta)d\theta##.

And, if we project that range onto the x-axis, ##(x, x+dx)##, then the probability it lands in that range is ##\rho'(x) dx##

Note I've used ##\rho'## to indicate that it's actually a different function in each case.
 
Why does projecting this range conserves probability?
The intervals are different...

Instead of projection I could have taken a completely weird relation like
u = rcos(##\theta##) + 3rsin(##\theta##/2)

Now the total range is r to 2r.

But interval of d##\theta## doesn't correspond to the interval of du... then there's no sense of "probability in this region of space" should be same...
 
Kaguro said:
Why does projecting this range conserves probability?
The intervals are different...

Instead of projection I could have taken a completely weird relation like
u = rcos(##\theta##) + 3rsin(##\theta##/2)

Now the total range is r to 2r.

But interval of d##\theta## doesn't correspond to the interval of du... then there's no sense of "probability in this region of space" should be same...

In this case ##x## and ##dx## can be expressed as the appropriate functions of ##\theta##. Probability must be conserved.

E.g. if we had a line at an angle, then there would be a linear relationship between the length along the line and the ##x## coordinate. In this case the mapping is from the semi-circle to the diameter.
 
I think that, yes... it should be correct..

The interval is just a matter of system...

The physical reality of probability must not depend upon the system used...

If the interval is different then the density also should be different so as to conserve the probability..
 
Kaguro said:
I think that, yes... it should be correct..

The interval is just a matter of system...

The physical reality of probability must not depend upon the system used...

If the interval is different then the density also should be different so as to conserve the probability..

Yes, which is why ##\rho## is a different function in each case.
 
It's really a nuissance with this book. Of course you must write ##\tilde{\rho}(x)## since it's NOT the same function. A density by definition transforms as a density! Who'd guessed this.

It's easy to understand. If you have a random number ##\theta## with a probability distribution ##\rho(\theta)## then the meaning is: When measuring ##\theta## the probability to find its value to be in an infinitesimal intervall ##(\theta,\theta+\mathrm{d}\theta)## is given by ##\mathrm{d} P=\mathrm{d} \theta \rho(\theta)##.

Now we have a one-to-one map from ##\theta \in [0,\pi]## to ##x \in[-L,L]## given by ##x=L \cos \theta##, where ##L## is the length of the needle. Since it's a one-to-one mapping the probability to find ##\theta## in the intervall ##(\theta,\theta+\mathrm{d} \theta)## we have
$$\rho(\theta) \mathrm{d} \theta = \tilde{\rho}(x) \mathrm{d} x,$$
from which we get
$$\tilde{\rho}(x)=\rho(\theta) \left |\frac{\mathrm{d} \theta}{\mathrm{d} x} \right|.$$
Now ##\theta=\arccos(x/L)## and thus ##|\mathrm{d} \theta/\mathrm{d} x|=\frac{1}{\sqrt{L^2-x^2}}##. So we finally get
$$\tilde{\rho}(x)=\frac{1}{\pi \sqrt{L^2-x^2}}, \quad x \in [-L,L],$$
because obviously ##\Theta(\theta)=1/\pi##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K