MHB Doubt in factoring a trinomial

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathlearn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Doubt Factoring
mathlearn
Messages
331
Reaction score
0
Hey (Wave) (Party),

Problem

Factor $3x^2+11x+10$

Workings

This expression can be separated into,

$3x^2+10x+x+10$

Where have i done wrong ? (Thinking)

Many Thanks :)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What I would do here is observe that:

$$3\cdot10=30$$

$$6\cdot5=30$$

$$6+5=11$$

Hence:

$$3x^2+11x+10=(3x+5)(x+2)$$
 
MarkFL said:
What I would do here is observe that:

$$3\cdot10=30$$

$$6\cdot5=30$$

$$6+5=11$$

Hence:

$$3x^2+11x+10=(3x+5)(x+2)$$

Did you multiply the expression by 3 (Happy) to get 30.
 
mathlearn said:
Did you multiply the expression by 3 (Happy) to get 30.

I multiplied the first coefficient by the last to get 30, and then looked for two factors of this product whose sum is 11, which are 6 and 5.

Here's a tutorial I wrote on the subject:

http://mathhelpboards.com/math-notes-49/factoring-quadratics-3396.html
 
Alternatively,

$$\begin{align*}3x^2+11x+10&=3x^2+5x+6x+10 \\
&=x(3x+5)+2(3x+5) \\
&=(3x+5)(x+2)\end{align*}$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
4K
Back
Top