Doubts about the relativistic description of electrical interactions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the interpretation of electrical interactions as local deformations of space-time, akin to gravitational forces. The original poster questions whether electric forces, which act over shorter distances, can be modeled similarly to gravity, which is described by space-time curvature. However, responses clarify that electric forces do not behave like gravitational forces, as uncharged particles are unaffected by electric fields, and attempts to unify electromagnetism with general relativity, such as Kaluza-Klein theory, have not yielded successful models. The consensus is that the proposed idea lacks scientific grounding.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity (GR) principles
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic (EM) theory
  • Knowledge of Kaluza-Klein theory and its implications
  • Basic concepts of space-time curvature
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of general relativity and its mathematical framework
  • Study the fundamentals of electromagnetic theory and its applications
  • Examine Kaluza-Klein theory and its attempts to unify forces
  • Explore the concept of space-time curvature and its experimental confirmations
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the relationship between electromagnetism and gravity.

Hak
Messages
709
Reaction score
56
I would like help with an issue that I have not yet fully mastered.
Consider a particle resting on a plane, it is subjected to a gravitational force, which can be interpreted as the result of a deformation of space-time.
It remains at rest due to the upward binding reaction provided by the plane. Could the electrical interactions that constitute this force be interpreted as a local deformation of space-time? I say this because it seems natural to me that two phenomena that elide each other can in fact be traced back to the same nature, and it seems quite simple to interpret how a particle is at rest if it is in a space with locally zero space-time deformation (no local curvature). Am I wrong?
Then, electric forces act over smaller distances than gravity, but equilibrium should occur where the two space-time deformations overlap at zero, no? This would explain the action-reaction principle, as the shape of space-time cannot be curved at sharp angles (second derivative less than infinity) and therefore around the equilibrium point, the limit of the first derivative on either side would tend to the same value. Therefore, from an experimental confirmation point of view, can a strong electrical interaction locally deflect a beam of light?
Thank you for any clarification.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hak said:
Could the electrical interactions that constitute this force be interpreted as a local deformation of space-time?
Not unless you can explain why uncharged particles aren't affected by the "electric spacetime curvature". The whole reason you can model gravity as spacetime curvature is that all objects follow the same path given the same initial position and velocity in the absence of other forces and that is not true for electric forces.

Attempts to include EM in GR have been made, such as Kaluza-Klein theory. None has worked - Kaluza-Klein adds a fifth dimension, but ends up predicting the existence of a strong scalar field that we don't see.
Hak said:
electric forces act over smaller distances than gravity
No they don't. They're both infinite ranged.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK and Dale
This thread is closed.
There is little to be gained by discussing a half-baked speculative idea like “Could the electrical interactions that constitute this force be interpreted as a local deformation of space-time?”; @ibix’s answer above explains why.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK and Dale

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K