Dow Breaks 14000: New Highs Since 2007?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the recent milestone of the Dow Jones Industrial Average breaking the 14,000 mark for the first time since 2007. Participants explore the implications of this event in the context of economic recovery, market behavior, and the impact of inflation on investment values.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the Dow's recent rise is a positive sign, suggesting a recovery since the economic crash.
  • Others express skepticism about the sustainability of the market gains, particularly with potential interest rate increases and market withdrawals.
  • There is a discussion about the creation of new wealth since the crash and whether it benefits those who lost wealth during the downturn.
  • Some participants highlight that the nominal value of 14,000 is less significant when adjusted for inflation, suggesting a need to reach higher levels to reflect true economic recovery.
  • A few participants mention historical trends indicating that markets often decline after reaching new highs, raising caution about current investments.
  • There are references to the S&P 500's performance in relation to the Dow, indicating a broader market trend.
  • Some participants share personal experiences regarding their retirement accounts and the perceived benefits of the market's performance.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential for a market correction, with references to expert opinions advising caution for investors.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of optimism and caution regarding the market's performance. While some view the rise as a sign of recovery, others remain skeptical about its sustainability and the implications of rising interest rates. There is no consensus on the future trajectory of the market or the impact of inflation on investment values.

Contextual Notes

Discussions include varying assumptions about the relationship between market performance and individual wealth recovery, as well as differing interpretations of historical market behavior. The impact of inflation on the perceived value of the Dow is also a point of contention.

Who May Find This Useful

Investors, financial analysts, and individuals interested in market trends and economic recovery may find this discussion relevant.

Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
8,252
Reaction score
2,664
The Dow broke the 14000 mark today for the first time since 2007. The all-time high was I think 14,164, so we are very close to seeing new highs for the first time since the economy crashed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Very good sign, but I have a hard time trusting anything. What happens when interest rates begin to rise and people start taking money out of the market? Will it have stabilized by then?
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
Very good sign, but I have a hard time trusting anything. What happens when interest rates begin to rise and people start taking money out of the market? Will it have stabilized by then?

As I understand this, when the market crashed, a great deal of wealth turned to vapor. So to me the most important thing is that a tremendous amount of new wealth has been created. Eventually this wealth must manifest throughout the rest of the economy.

If people are taking new wealth from the market and distributing that elsewhere, that's a good thing. Right?
 
Ivan Seeking said:
As I understand this, when the market crashed, a great deal of wealth turned to vapor. So to me the most important thing is that a tremendous amount of new wealth has been created. Eventually this wealth must manifest throughout the rest of the economy.

I wonder if the people who are making the new wealth were the people who lost it. In some cases maybe, in most I bet not, and that is the problem.
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
I wonder if the people who are making the new wealth were the people who lost it. In some cases maybe, in most I bet not, and that is the problem.

Most people with mutual funds should be benefitting. That includes a good pecentage of retirement plans like the one we have.
 
[response to Greg] Nah, I bet most were the same people and I'd go further to re-characterize the issue: I bet most of the excessive gains and losses were never realized anyway.
 
russ_watters said:
[response to Greg] Nah, I bet most were the same people and I'd go further to re-characterize the issue: I bet most of the excessive gains and losses were never realized anyway.

Funny how when the market crashed, the first thing people wanted to do is to pull out their money. But as you say, most people probably just sat it out and have now recaptured the previous losses.

It should be noted that the S&P is following suit with the Dow. Mutual funds are often invested in the S&P.
 
Ivan Seeking said:
The Dow broke the 14000 mark today for the first time since 2007.

Of course, 14000 isn't worth as much as it was in 2007. Applying the Consumer Price Index for December 2007 and December 2012, I get 14000 * 229.594 / 207.342 = 15502. So we still have a way to go before we really catch up.

I have to admit last month's gain does look good in my retirement accumulation, on top of the big gain we had last year.
 
Last edited:
jtbell said:
Of course, 14000 isn't worth as much as it was in 2007. Applying the Consumer Price Index for December 2007 and December 2012, I get 14000 * 229.594 / 207.342 = 15502. So we still have a way to go before we really catch up.

I have to admit last month's gain does look good in my retirement accumulation, on top of the big gain we had last year.

Picky picky, :biggrin: Of course it isn't necessarily reasonable to take the all-time high as representitive of the average value at the time the crash began. That could have been a transient spike even in a good economy. :-p

A good bit better than the low of ~ 6500 right after Obama took office, in either case.
 
  • #10
This is a bad sign. Historically, stocks have tended to go down after reaching a high.
 
  • #11
No surprise to me - my 401k has been going gangbusters for several years now.

Go, economy, go!
 
  • #12
jtbell said:
Of course, 14000 isn't worth as much as it was in 2007. Applying the Consumer Price Index for December 2007 and December 2012, I get 14000 * 229.594 / 207.342 = 15502. So we still have a way to go before we really catch up. ...
Yes, and at which point the real return will be flat on money invested in 2007 at the peak - flat over five years, so far.
 
  • #13
mheslep said:
Yes, and at which point the real return will be flat on money invested in 2007 at the peak - flat over five years, so far.

But over doubled in the last four years - since April of 2009.
 
  • #14
Looks like it broke 14000 again today, in the other direction. Now we can apply Rolle's theorem.
 
  • #15
Jimmy Snyder said:
This is a bad sign. Historically, stocks have tended to go down after reaching a high.

jbunniii said:
Looks like it broke 14000 again today, in the other direction. Now we can apply Rolle's theorem.

Holy cow, Jimmy was right :eek:!
 
  • #16
They go uppity up up, they come downditty down down...
 
  • #17
...and they go uppity up up again. The Dow edged over 14000 a couple of times today, then ended a bit under, but still 0.7% higher for the day. Bungee jumping, anyone? :wink:
 
  • #18
  • #19
Jaffe has hit the nail on the head. Caution is advised for investors who are buying or selling while those on the sidelines should consider reallocating in order to generate extra transaction cost benefits. This is no time for optimistic hedging nor for pessimistic backing and filling. In other words, the market is likely to either rise, fall, or remain steady going forward and therefor a balanced approach of buying, selling, and holding is recommended.
 
  • #20
Jimmy Snyder said:
Jaffe has hit the nail on the head. Caution is advised for investors who are buying or selling while those on the sidelines should consider reallocating in order to generate extra transaction cost benefits. This is no time for optimistic hedging nor for pessimistic backing and filling. In other words, the market is likely to either rise, fall, or remain steady going forward and therefor a balanced approach of buying, selling, and holding is recommended.

Jimmy, you'd be amazed at how frequently you make my day :smile:.
 
  • #21
lisab said:
Jimmy, you'd be amazed at how frequently you make my day :smile:.
Funny, Clint Eastwood told me the same thing.
 
  • #22
Jimmy Snyder said:
Jaffe has hit the nail on the head. Caution is advised for investors who are buying or selling while those on the sidelines should consider reallocating in order to generate extra transaction cost benefits. This is no time for optimistic hedging nor for pessimistic backing and filling. In other words, the market is likely to either rise, fall, or remain steady going forward and therefor a balanced approach of buying, selling, and holding is recommended.

Since they've been wrong up to now, obviously we should expect them to be right this time.

I would go with Smith Barney. They make money the old fashioned way. They churn it.
 
  • #23
Ivan Seeking said:
The [Dow's] all-time high was I think 14,164, so we are very close to seeing new highs for the first time since the economy crashed.

As I write this, it's at 14,239, which is above both its all-time closing high of 14,164.53 and its record intraday high of 14,198.10. Both records were set in October 2007.

As previously noted, this doesn't take into account intervening inflation. And of course if one had stayed "invested in the Dow" throughout (e.g. by holding shares in its component companies, in the appropriate weights), and re-invested all dividends along the way, the total now would be significantly higher than the index indicates.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 83 ·
3
Replies
83
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K