Dp/dt in the relativistic domain

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Repetit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Domain Relativistic
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The equation \(\overrightarrow{F}=\frac{d\overrightarrow{p}}{dt}\) is valid in the relativistic domain, provided that the time-dependence of mass is fully accounted for. The discussion emphasizes the use of the product rule for momentum, \(\frac{dp}{dt} = \frac{d}{dt} (m_r v) = \frac{dm_r}{dt} v + m_r \frac{dv}{dt}\), or expressing momentum in terms of invariant mass, \(\frac{dp}{dt} = \frac{d}{dt} \left( \frac{m_0 v}{\sqrt{1 - v^2 / c^2}} \right)\). It is noted that while \(\frac{dp}{dt}\) can define "force" in both special relativity (SR) and Newtonian physics, the term "force" is best avoided in the context of SR to prevent confusion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of relativistic momentum and invariant mass
  • Familiarity with Newton's second law of motion
  • Knowledge of calculus, specifically the product rule
  • Basic principles of special relativity (SR)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of relativistic mass and its effects on momentum
  • Learn about alternative definitions of force in special relativity
  • Explore the mathematical derivation of relativistic momentum
  • Investigate the relationship between force and acceleration in relativistic contexts
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of physics, and anyone interested in the applications of Newtonian mechanics in the relativistic domain.

Repetit
Messages
128
Reaction score
2
Just a quick question which came to my mind when reading a historical article on Newtons second law. Is \overrightarrow{F}=\frac{d\overrightarrow{p}}{dt} correct in the relativistic domain because the mass is not necessarily constant?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It still works, so long as you take into account the time-dependence completely. Either use the product rule:

\frac{dp}{dt} = \frac {d}{dt} (m_r v) = \frac{dm_r}{dt} v + m_r \frac{dv}{dt}

or write it in terms of invariant mass:

\frac{dp}{dt} = \frac {d}{dt} \left( \frac {m_0 v} {\sqrt {1 - v^2 / c^2} } \right) = m_0 \frac {d}{dt} \left( \frac {v} {\sqrt {1 - v^2 / c^2} } \right)
 
Last edited:
Repetit said:
Just a quick question which came to my mind when reading a historical article on Newtons second law. Is \overrightarrow{F}=\frac{d\overrightarrow{p}}{dt} correct in the relativistic domain because the mass is not necessarily constant?
F=dp/dt can be taken as one definition of "force" in either SR or Newtonian physics. However there are other possible, equally reasonable, definitions of "force" in SR. It is best to stop using the word "force" in SR. If you mean
dp/dt, just say dp/dt.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
953
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K