Hey,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

In a derivation of relativistic energy (in Physics for Scientists and Engineers, 5th edition, Serway and Beichner) they use a method of integration by substitution:

Given that

[itex]F=\frac{dp}{dt}[/itex]

and relativistic momentum is given by

[itex]p=\frac{mv}{\sqrt(1-(v^2/c^2))}[/itex]

[itex]W=∫F dx=∫\frac{dp}{dt} dx[/itex]

which is fine then they say

[itex]\frac{dp}{dt}=\frac{d}{dt}\frac{mv}{\sqrt(1−(\frac{(v^2)}{c^2}))}=\frac{m\frac{dv}{dt}}{(1−(\frac{v^2}{c^2}))^(\frac{3}{2})}[/itex]

(This is about halfway through the derivation.)

its that last step that i dont understand. why does the denominator term now have a 3/2 index? and why is du/dt given like that? Any help would be appreciated.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Relativistic Energy Derivation math problem

Loading...

Similar Threads - Relativistic Energy Derivation | Date |
---|---|

I A question about the relativistic energy dispersion relation | Feb 20, 2018 |

I Relativistic Kinetic Energy Derivation | Mar 28, 2016 |

Relativistic kinetic energy derivation (from Work expended) | Dec 11, 2014 |

Derivation of Energy-Momentum Relation WITHOUT using relativistic mass? | Dec 17, 2010 |

Derivation of relativistic energy | Feb 10, 2005 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**