Driving past your opponent in a space race

  • Thread starter cliowa
  • Start date
  • #1
191
0
The situation is this: Two space vehicles A and B are doing a race in space. A is in front of B and they are both in orbit around the earth. For simplicity let this orbit be a circle (i.e. neglectable eccentricity). Now, B wants to get past A, that is, B wants to cross the "line" connecting the center of the earth and A in his orbit. That means, he'll catch up a higher angular velocity [tex]\omega[/tex]. B has two choices: he can break or he can accelerate (both in tangential dierction). What should B do?
For simplicity ignore all details: B won't lose any mass, and he'll stay in an (approximately) circular orbit.

One approach would be this: B could brake instantaneously and thereby lower his angular momentum [tex]L=mrv=mr^{2} \omega[/tex], which would get him behind and then make him "fall" to a lower orbit, picking up speed. Looking at [tex]\omega[/tex] as a function of [tex]L[/tex], one gets: [tex]\omega(L)=C\cdot L^{-3}[/tex], [tex]C[/tex] being some constant involving the masses etc. but not the radii. This would lead to argue: If [tex]L[/tex] goes down (braking) [tex]\omega[/tex] must go up and B will pass by A.

Now, I'm not so sure about the validity of this argument, as there are several critical points. First of all: If B brakes instantaneously, i.e. his speed [tex]v[/tex] decreases, so does his [tex]L[/tex] (that's ok so far). But this also means, that [tex]\omega[/tex] would decrease. How could I tell that the increase of [tex]\omega[/tex] caused by falling towards the earth is bigger than this decrease?
Second: Are the simplifications made here ignoring important aspects or even not valid at all? This whole low eccentricity thing might spoil our argument.

Thanks for any comments. Best regards...Cliowa
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
191
0
To the admins: I'm sorry I wasn't careful enough, but: Maybe this thread should be moved to the "Classical Physics" section (?).
 
  • #3
80
0
instead of breaking, he should try rocketing towards the center, he would then accelerate in the direction of the race
 
  • #4
191
0
skywolf said:
rocketing towards the center
I'm sorry this is not an option, I'm talking about braking/accelerating exclusively in the direction tangential to the orbit.

Thanks anyway.
Best regards...Cliowa
 
  • #5
Janus
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
3,558
1,329
If B brakes instantanously it will begin to fall in toward the Earth. As it does so, it will speed up, exchanging potential energy for kinetic. After it has traveled 180° in its orbit, it will be at its lowest point and moving its fastest. It will then start to pull away from the Earth and 180° later end up right back where it started with the same velocity it had after it braked. IOW, it will enter a elliptical orbit with the staring point as the apogee.

Since the period of an orbit decreases with a decrease in its average radius, and the new orbit's average raduis is smaller than A's, B will catch and pass A.
 
  • #6
191
0
Thanks alot, Janus.
How did you get those exact numbers ("After it has traveled 180° in its orbit..." and so forth)? When I said B brakes I meant that be doesn't "stop", but simply lowers his speed.

What do you think would happen, if B were only allowed to brake a little tiny bit (so that his orbit would stay more or less circular)? Same argumentation, right?
 
  • #7
Janus
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
3,558
1,329
cliowa said:
Thanks alot, Janus.
How did you get those exact numbers ("After it has traveled 180° in its orbit..." and so forth)?
After braking, a new orbit is made. One of a different eccentricity, but will return to the same point. This makes the point of Braking the Apogee of the New orbit. Apogee and Perigee are always 180° apart.
When I said B brakes I meant that be doesn't "stop", but simply lowers his speed.
As did I. When he lowers his speed he no longer has enough velocity to maintain a circular orbit at that altitude, hence he begins to drift in towards the Earth.
What do you think would happen, if B were only allowed to brake a little tiny bit (so that his orbit would stay more or less circular)? Same argumentation, right?
He would still change the eccentricity and average radius of his orbit slighty, and the difference in period will undergo a like small change. The difference would be that it would just take longer for B to overtake A.
 
  • #8
191
0
Ok, thanks alot.
Best regards...Cliowa
 
  • #9
14
0
janus you said that if he braked he would begin to fall twards earth increasing his speed, I think that would only happen if he was going below his terminal velocity? am I wrong?
 
  • #10
DaveC426913
Gold Member
18,909
2,414
kmbop53 said:
janus you said that if he braked he would begin to fall twards earth increasing his speed, I think that would only happen if he was going below his terminal velocity? am I wrong?
You mean terminal velocity due to atmospheric friction?? Does not apply here. This is orbital mechanics, not ballistics.

He will fall towards Earth as his orbit takes him close, just as ALL bodies in elliptical orbits abide by Kepler's Laws.
 

Related Threads on Driving past your opponent in a space race

  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
764
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
832
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
869
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
1K
Top