Driving past your opponent in a space race

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cliowa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Race Space
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the dynamics of two space vehicles, A and B, racing in a circular orbit around the Earth. The focus is on the strategies B can employ to overtake A, specifically through braking or accelerating in a tangential direction. Participants explore the implications of these maneuvers on angular momentum and orbital mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Cliowa presents a scenario where vehicle B wants to overtake vehicle A and discusses the potential effects of braking on angular momentum and angular velocity.
  • Some participants suggest that braking would cause B to fall towards the Earth, increasing its speed due to the conversion of potential energy to kinetic energy, leading to an elliptical orbit.
  • There is a question about the validity of the argument regarding the relationship between braking, angular momentum, and the resulting change in orbit.
  • Janus explains that if B brakes, it will no longer maintain a circular orbit and will drift inward, eventually leading to a faster speed at a lower point in the orbit.
  • Participants discuss the effects of minor braking on the eccentricity of the orbit and the time it would take for B to overtake A.
  • There is a challenge regarding the concept of terminal velocity and its relevance to the discussion, with clarification that the context is orbital mechanics rather than atmospheric conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of braking and the resulting orbital changes. While some agree on the mechanics of falling towards the Earth and increasing speed, others question the assumptions made about braking and its effects on orbit. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge simplifications in the scenario, such as neglecting eccentricity and the effects of braking on angular momentum. There are also discussions about the assumptions regarding the nature of braking and its impact on orbital dynamics.

cliowa
Messages
190
Reaction score
0
The situation is this: Two space vehicles A and B are doing a race in space. A is in front of B and they are both in orbit around the earth. For simplicity let this orbit be a circle (i.e. neglectable eccentricity). Now, B wants to get past A, that is, B wants to cross the "line" connecting the center of the Earth and A in his orbit. That means, he'll catch up a higher angular velocity [tex]\omega[/tex]. B has two choices: he can break or he can accelerate (both in tangential dierction). What should B do?
For simplicity ignore all details: B won't lose any mass, and he'll stay in an (approximately) circular orbit.

One approach would be this: B could brake instantaneously and thereby lower his angular momentum [tex]L=mrv=mr^{2} \omega[/tex], which would get him behind and then make him "fall" to a lower orbit, picking up speed. Looking at [tex]\omega[/tex] as a function of [tex]L[/tex], one gets: [tex]\omega(L)=C\cdot L^{-3}[/tex], [tex]C[/tex] being some constant involving the masses etc. but not the radii. This would lead to argue: If [tex]L[/tex] goes down (braking) [tex]\omega[/tex] must go up and B will pass by A.

Now, I'm not so sure about the validity of this argument, as there are several critical points. First of all: If B brakes instantaneously, i.e. his speed [tex]v[/tex] decreases, so does his [tex]L[/tex] (that's ok so far). But this also means, that [tex]\omega[/tex] would decrease. How could I tell that the increase of [tex]\omega[/tex] caused by falling towards the Earth is bigger than this decrease?
Second: Are the simplifications made here ignoring important aspects or even not valid at all? This whole low eccentricity thing might spoil our argument.

Thanks for any comments. Best regards...Cliowa
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
To the admins: I'm sorry I wasn't careful enough, but: Maybe this thread should be moved to the "Classical Physics" section (?).
 
instead of breaking, he should try rocketing towards the center, he would then accelerate in the direction of the race
 
skywolf said:
rocketing towards the center

I'm sorry this is not an option, I'm talking about braking/accelerating exclusively in the direction tangential to the orbit.

Thanks anyway.
Best regards...Cliowa
 
If B brakes instantaneously it will begin to fall in toward the Earth. As it does so, it will speed up, exchanging potential energy for kinetic. After it has traveled 180° in its orbit, it will be at its lowest point and moving its fastest. It will then start to pull away from the Earth and 180° later end up right back where it started with the same velocity it had after it braked. IOW, it will enter a elliptical orbit with the staring point as the apogee.

Since the period of an orbit decreases with a decrease in its average radius, and the new orbit's average raduis is smaller than A's, B will catch and pass A.
 
Thanks a lot, Janus.
How did you get those exact numbers ("After it has traveled 180° in its orbit..." and so forth)? When I said B brakes I meant that be doesn't "stop", but simply lowers his speed.

What do you think would happen, if B were only allowed to brake a little tiny bit (so that his orbit would stay more or less circular)? Same argumentation, right?
 
cliowa said:
Thanks a lot, Janus.
How did you get those exact numbers ("After it has traveled 180° in its orbit..." and so forth)?
After braking, a new orbit is made. One of a different eccentricity, but will return to the same point. This makes the point of Braking the Apogee of the New orbit. Apogee and Perigee are always 180° apart.
When I said B brakes I meant that be doesn't "stop", but simply lowers his speed.
As did I. When he lowers his speed he no longer has enough velocity to maintain a circular orbit at that altitude, hence he begins to drift in towards the Earth.
What do you think would happen, if B were only allowed to brake a little tiny bit (so that his orbit would stay more or less circular)? Same argumentation, right?

He would still change the eccentricity and average radius of his orbit slighty, and the difference in period will undergo a like small change. The difference would be that it would just take longer for B to overtake A.
 
Ok, thanks a lot.
Best regards...Cliowa
 
janus you said that if he braked he would begin to fall twards Earth increasing his speed, I think that would only happen if he was going below his terminal velocity? am I wrong?
 
  • #10
kmbop53 said:
janus you said that if he braked he would begin to fall twards Earth increasing his speed, I think that would only happen if he was going below his terminal velocity? am I wrong?
You mean terminal velocity due to atmospheric friction?? Does not apply here. This is orbital mechanics, not ballistics.

He will fall towards Earth as his orbit takes him close, just as ALL bodies in elliptical orbits abide by Kepler's Laws.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 86 ·
3
Replies
86
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
83K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K