OldYat47
- 255
- 32
Of course not. Collisions are simultaneous events. And there is a basic fault in my original logic. I'm pretty rusty, it seems. I guess I should be consoled that I caught it first.
A true comparison is when the force and distance are the same but the masses of the objects change. That is, the product of mass 1 and mass 2 is the same in both cases.
So let m1 = 2 and m2 =2.
F = (G*4)/d^2, the acceleration of each mass is (G*2)/d^2, and
A closing = (G*4)/d^2
Now let m1 = 1 and m2 = 4
F doesn't change, = (G*4)/d^2
But the accelerations do change:
Am1 = (G*4)/d^2
Am2 = (G)/d^2, and
A closing = (G*5)/d^2
So in cases where the gravitational force is equal, where masses are equal closing acceleration is lower than where masses are unequal. The greater the difference in masses, the greater the closing acceleration.
A true comparison is when the force and distance are the same but the masses of the objects change. That is, the product of mass 1 and mass 2 is the same in both cases.
So let m1 = 2 and m2 =2.
F = (G*4)/d^2, the acceleration of each mass is (G*2)/d^2, and
A closing = (G*4)/d^2
Now let m1 = 1 and m2 = 4
F doesn't change, = (G*4)/d^2
But the accelerations do change:
Am1 = (G*4)/d^2
Am2 = (G)/d^2, and
A closing = (G*5)/d^2
So in cases where the gravitational force is equal, where masses are equal closing acceleration is lower than where masses are unequal. The greater the difference in masses, the greater the closing acceleration.