Throwing an object upwards and dropping it

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Maxo
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the physics of two objects with the same mass: one thrown upwards and the other dropped. Participants explore whether these objects have the same speed upon hitting the ground, considering concepts such as energy conservation and kinematics. The scope includes theoretical reasoning and conceptual clarification.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that the object thrown upwards and the one dropped will not have the same speed upon hitting the ground, citing differences in the time of fall and energy considerations.
  • Others propose that throwing an object upwards gives it additional kinetic energy, resulting in a greater speed when it hits the ground compared to an object simply dropped.
  • A participant mentions that throwing an object downwards at a certain speed results in a higher impact velocity than dropping it, raising questions about the effects of initial velocity.
  • Some participants note that throwing an object upwards and then downwards with the same initial speed will result in the same impact speed, suggesting a relationship between energy conservation and initial conditions.
  • There is discussion about the conservation of mechanical energy, with some participants emphasizing the importance of considering only the vertical component of velocity in gravitational scenarios.
  • A later reply questions whether the energy calculations differ for objects thrown horizontally versus those dropped, while also noting that both will have the same velocity upon hitting the ground.
  • One participant introduces a thought experiment involving an elevator to further explore the implications of initial velocity on impact speed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether the objects have the same speed upon impact, with multiple competing views and ongoing debate regarding the effects of initial velocity and energy conservation.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the application of conservation of mechanical energy in two-dimensional motion and the relevance of horizontal velocity in the context of gravitational effects.

Maxo
Messages
160
Reaction score
1
Two objects with same mass. One is being thrown upwards, and the other one is dropped. Do they have the same speed when hitting ground? I think they have. Let's say the object being thrown upwards goes up 3 meters, then starts accelerating downwards. That will be the same as having dropped the object from 3 meters higher. So one object falls for 3 meters longer than the other. Then it must have more time to accelerate, and so it will have a greater velocity when reaching the ground.

Why is this not correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maxo said:
Do they have the same speed when hitting ground? I think they have.

Why is this not correct?
You managed to explain why pretty clearly why this isn't the case.
 
I made a typo, I meant I don't think they have the same speed. But is that correct?
 
Maxo said:
Two objects with same mass. One is being thrown upwards, and the other one is dropped. Do they have the same speed when hitting ground? I think they have.
No,they don't.
Maxo said:
Let's say the object being thrown upwards goes up 3 meters, then starts accelerating downwards. That will be the same as having dropped the object from 3 meters higher. So one object falls for 3 meters longer than the other. Then it must have more time to accelerate, and so it will have a greater velocity when reaching the ground.

Why is this not correct?

This can also be explained using the conservation of energy.
We will throw and drop it at a height of ##h##
When you throw one of the object up,you give kinetic energy to it, increasing the total mechanical energy. Now it will have ##E=mgh+\frac{1}{2}mv^2## while the other object had ##mgh## only.
That means that when it hits the ground, the kinetic energy of obj 1 will be greater than that of obj 2

Edit: You guys beat me to it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Maxo said:
Do they have the same speed when hitting ground? I think they have.
Why do you think that?

A ball thrown downwards at 10 meters/second will hit the ground with a higher velocity than will a ball that is simply dropped (zero initial velocity). What do you think the difference will be in impact velocity between a ball thrown upwards at 10 meters/second versus one thrown downwards at 10 meters/second?
 
Thanks. It's interesting to note that throwing an object up with a certain speed and throwing it downwards with the same speed will eventually hit the ground with the same speed.
 
Maxo said:
Thanks. It's interesting to note that throwing an object up with a certain speed and throwing it downwards with the same speed will eventually hit the ground with the same speed.

That can also be explained by the conservation of energy.
Throwing down at a speed ##v## at height ##h##: ##E_M=\frac{1}{2}mv^2+mgh##
Throwing up at that speed ##v## at that height ##h## : ##E_M=\frac{1}{2}mv^2+mgh##

I find it easier to use conservation of mechanical energy than using kinematic equations.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
adjacent said:
I find it easier to use conservation of mechanical energy than using kinematic equations.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but when using the conservation of mech energy principle in situations involving gravitation one must be careful at only looking at velocity in y-direction. So if there is velocity in x-direction it should not be included in the equation.
 
Maxo said:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but when using the conservation of mech energy principle in situations involving gravitation one must be careful at only looking at velocity in y-direction. So if there is velocity in x-direction it should not be included in the equation.
I have only studied velocities in one direction only. So I use mech conservation all the time. :wink:
 
  • #10
If you are considering a particle moving in two dimensions along some curve y(x), under the influence of gravity, then relative to a fixed Cartesian coordinate system the total energy is the sum of the particle's kinetic energy and potential energy. That is, $$E_T = \frac{m}{2}\left(\dot{x}^2 + \dot{y}^2\right) + mg \,y(x).$$
Energy is additive, so you can simply add up the kinetic energy in each direction. Under the influence of only conservative forces, this quantity will be fixed, determined by the initial conditions of the particle.
 
  • #11
CAF123 said:
If you are considering a particle moving in two dimensions along some curve y(x), under the influence of gravity, then relative to a fixed Cartesian coordinate system the total energy is the sum of the particle's kinetic energy and potential energy. That is, $$E_T = \frac{m}{2}\left(\dot{x}^2 + \dot{y}^2\right) + mg \,y(x).$$
Energy is additive, so you can simply add up the kinetic energy in each direction. Under the influence of only conservative forces, this quantity will be fixed, determined by the initial conditions of the particle.

Wouldn't this give a different energy for an object being thrown horizontally (+x direction) than the same object being dropped? Yet these will have the same velocity when hitting the ground? How is that possible?
 
  • #12
Maxo said:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but when using the conservation of mech energy principle in situations involving gravitation one must be careful at only looking at velocity in y-direction. So if there is velocity in x-direction it should not be included in the equation.
You are wrong. (But since the x-component of velocity would not change, it doesn't matter.)
 
  • #13
Maxo said:
Wouldn't this give a different energy for an object being thrown horizontally (+x direction) than the same object being dropped? Yet these will have the same velocity when hitting the ground? How is that possible?
Why do you think that an object thrown horizontally will have the same velocity upon hitting the ground as a dropped object?
 
  • #14
Related Puzzle:

By accident you walk into an elevator shaft, with the elevator at rest somewhere far below you. Before you start to fall you have just enough time to push one of two buttons:
- UP will instantaneously make the elevator move up with a constant speed V
- DOWN will instantaneously make the elevator move down with a constant speed V
What do you do (to minimize your impact speed) ?

Assume no air resistance, and that when pressing DOWN you will reach the elevator before it reaches ground floor.
 
  • #15
A.T. said:
Related Puzzle:

By accident you walk into an elevator shaft, with the elevator at rest somewhere far below you. Before you start to fall you have just enough time to push one of two buttons:
- UP will instantaneously make the elevator move up with a constant speed V
- DOWN will instantaneously make the elevator move down with a constant speed V
What do you do (to minimize your impact speed) ?

Assume no air resistance, and that when pressing DOWN you will reach the elevator before it reaches ground floor.


Nice one. :-)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
8K