Dubaija vu: Now it's the airlines.

  • #1
Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
7,260
310
...Under the existing regulations, foreign investors can have no influence on any operations of a U.S. airline in which they invest. Under the proposed rule, the majority U.S. investors could delegate to foreign investors control over some commercial decisions, such as what routes to fly and what aircraft to buy and sell, Shane said.[continued]
http://usinfo.state.gov/xarchives/display.html?p=washfile-english&y=2006&m=May&x=20060509174659ebyessedo0.882229&t=livefeeds/wf-latest.html [Broken]

I can appreciate the desire for foreign investment, but again this gets into issues of national security. And the amount invested is still limited, which really makes one wonder. In any event, what's good for the corporations is not what's important, what matters is what's best for US security.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Pengwuino
Gold Member
4,989
16
I thought we already came to the conclusion that xenophobia was a bad thing. This sounds like a Nazi talking-point, "foreigners need not apply".
 
  • #3
67
166
Pengwuino said:
I thought we already came to the conclusion that xenophobia was a bad thing. This sounds like a Nazi talking-point, "foreigners need not apply".

What if this involved China and our airlines instead of Islamics. Would it still be a xenophobic Nazi talking-point?
 
  • #4
Pengwuino
Gold Member
4,989
16
I do believe China is a foreign country...sooooo.....
 
  • #5
67
166
Pengwuino said:
I do believe China is a foreign country...sooooo.....

China didn't have any luck with Unocal or Maytag. There must be a lot of xenophoobicals out there somewhere.:smile:
 
  • #6
67
166
Oops, China did get the maintenance contract on the new Boeing 777's.
 
  • #7
Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
7,260
310
Pengwuino said:
I thought we already came to the conclusion that xenophobia was a bad thing. This sounds like a Nazi talking-point, "foreigners need not apply".

Okay then you tell me, where is the end of the free-for-all? Which of the following should yield control to a foreign agency? Should we job out the Presidency; how about the CIA or NSA; the military; police and fire services; immigration and border control; Airport security; weapons factories; FBI? Do you agree that in some cases there can be issues of national security, or do you think that we should just hand over anything to anyone willing to pay? Do we need to demonstrate that airlines are a national security issue?

And if you compare me or anyone else here to the Nazis again you will be penalized.
 
Last edited:
  • #8
67
166
Ivan Seeking said:
Okay then you tell me, where is the end of the free-for-all? Which of the following should yield control to a foreign agency? Should we job out the Presidency; how about the CIA or NSA; the military; police and fire services; immigration and border control; Airport security; weapons factories; FBI? Do you agree that in some cases there can be issues of national security, or do you think that we should just hand over anything to anyone willing to pay? Do we need to demonstrate that airlines are a national security issue.

Good points and something that really bothers me. With all of the outsourcing combined with foreign companies, sometimes even state owned companies, buying into U.S. industries and services, what will we have left? At what point do we just say no.
 

Related Threads on Dubaija vu: Now it's the airlines.

  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
M
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
5
Replies
107
Views
10K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
16
Views
4K
Top