News Dwight D. warned us, did any pay attention?

  • Thread starter Thread starter amp
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on Dwight D. Eisenhower's warnings about the dangers of the military-industrial complex and corporate influence over government policy, as articulated in his farewell address. Participants highlight the implications of these warnings, particularly regarding the balance between national interests and individual responsibilities. Key points include the historical context of World War II, where oil played a significant role, and the ongoing relevance of Eisenhower's message in today's political climate. The conversation underscores the necessity of maintaining balance in governance and the potential consequences of neglecting these warnings.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Eisenhower's farewell address and its historical context.
  • Knowledge of the military-industrial complex and its implications for democracy.
  • Familiarity with the geopolitical factors influencing World War II, particularly regarding oil.
  • Awareness of current political dynamics related to corporate influence in government.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the full text of Eisenhower's farewell address for deeper insights.
  • Study the historical impact of the military-industrial complex on U.S. foreign policy.
  • Examine the role of oil in World War II and its strategic significance.
  • Investigate contemporary examples of corporate influence on government policy.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for historians, political scientists, policymakers, and anyone interested in the intersection of corporate power and government, as well as the historical lessons from Eisenhower's presidency.

  • #31
HallsofIvy said:
1. Yes, oil started the war with the Japanese- the Japanese desire to get more oil, not the United States.

2. Saying that it was lack of oil that doomed the Germans is not the same as saying "the war was all about oil". It may well be true that Hitler attacked Poland (starting the war) and then Russia to get at the oil fields in the Caucasus but, once again, "oil" was not the reason the Allies fought.


This post? It addresses my point in no way. You are wrong Hughes. You are just too small to admit it.

Njorl
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
I believe just prior to World War II, Japan was the only Asia nation that had not been colonized by a Western Power. Japan saw the writing on the wall. Japan felt that the only way it could survive as a nation and compete on an equal footing with the West was to carve out an empire for theirselves in Asia. Japan believe it was their devine right to do so, since they believed they were the superior Asia race. The oil fields and rubber plantations of Southeast Asia were required by the Japanese to fight a sustained war against the Allied powers and deny the Allies of these resources.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #33
hughes johnson said:
Good job again, selfAdjoint. The democrats change their history books as they go. :rolleyes:

Don't just single out democrats, you think they're the only politcians who distort facts?

Either way, as I understand it, the history books are generally written by those who win wars, not lose them.
 
Last edited:
  • #34
schwarzchildradius said:
News to me I thought it was fought to liberate the people of Europe and Japan from the fascism that Prescott Bush helped to finance.
It was not about oil for the US, but for Japan, as a country low on natural resources, it was a major factor. He is correct that oil made the Germans lose (or lose a lot faster).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
14K