Threats to the US: Past and present

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the historical context and implications of the "domino theory" in U.S. foreign policy, particularly during the Vietnam War and subsequent conflicts. David Brooks' comments highlight the perceived differences between past and present threats, emphasizing that the North Vietnamese did not pose a direct threat to the U.S. in the same way that modern terrorism does. The domino theory, which justified U.S. interventions in Vietnam and later in Central America, remains a contentious topic, with debates surrounding its validity and impact on U.S. foreign policy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the "domino theory" in Cold War context
  • Knowledge of U.S. foreign policy during the Vietnam War
  • Familiarity with the historical significance of the Reagan administration's interventions
  • Awareness of the cultural impact of Cold War-era nuclear drills
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the historical accuracy and critiques of the domino theory
  • Explore the implications of U.S. foreign policy decisions in Vietnam and their long-term effects
  • Investigate the role of public perception in shaping foreign policy during the Cold War
  • Analyze the evolution of U.S. military strategies in response to perceived threats
USEFUL FOR

Historians, political scientists, students of international relations, and anyone interested in understanding the complexities of U.S. foreign policy and its historical context.

Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
8,252
Reaction score
2,664
A recurring theme of this "war on terror" - that we have never faced a threat like this before - is found in David Brook's comments on PBS last night. The comparison between Vietnam and Iraq was considered, which led to the following statement:

... DAVID BROOKS: Right, I guess so, but, again, it doesn't change the fundamental situation. We could get out and withdraw, and the North Vietnamese were not coming to America. And that's the difference here. ...
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/politics/july-dec06/sb_10-20.html

WRONG! We fought in Vietnam, or so we were told, in order to stop the spread of communism via the "domino effect". The Reds were coming to get us!

The domino theory was a 20th Century foreign policy theory that speculated if one land in a region came under the influence of Communists, then more would follow in a domino effect. The domino effect indicates that some change, small in itself, will cause a similar change nearby, which then will cause another similar change, and so on in linear sequence, by analogy to a falling row of dominoes standing on end.

The theory was used by many United States leaders during the Cold War to justify U.S. intervention in the Vietnam War. The domino theory was applied by President Dwight D. Eisenhower and his top advisers in 1954 to describe the prospects of communist expansion in Asia if Indochina were to fall. Eisenhower argued that all of southeast Asia could fall. The theory's ultimate validity remained mixed, and debatable. After the U.S. left Vietnam, the North took over the South, and Cambodia and Laos had also turned to Communism, although Cambodia is no longer a communist state. This limited spread of Communism in Indochina provides ammunition for opponents of the theory, but both sides argue that the historical record overall supports their position.

In the 1980s, the domino theory was used again to justify the Reagan administration's interventions in Central America and the Caribbean region.[continued]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domino_effect

The world has always been hanging by a thread. When I grew up, we practiced hiding under our desks... in order to survive the ever present threat of a Soviet nuclear attack.

They were really strong desks. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ivan Seeking said:
When I grew up, we practiced hiding under our desks... in order to survive the ever present threat of a Soviet nuclear attack.

They were really strong desks. :rolleyes:
:smile: I was introduced to that custom in 4th grade when I moved to the US. In 3rd grade, I had read an article on the hydrogen bomb and its effects on a major metropolitan area. I guessed the teachers didn't appreciate my questioning the wisdom (or rather absurdity) of what we were doing in the CD drills.

In 6th grade, I was assigned to the school safety patrol. I was one of 8 students whose job it was to monitor the halls during fire drills and hold flags at the cross-walks so the lower grades could cross safely. :biggrin:
 
We had the duck and cover drills, too, though nothing could have saved us if the Russians wanted to bomb us. Our school was about 1/10 mile downstream from a very high-value target - a large hydro dam with a deep 15-mile impoundment that would have drowned downstream cities, including two county seats and the state capital. If you use Google Earth or similar and search on Moscow, Maine you can see what I mean.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
6K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
11K
Replies
44
Views
12K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
6K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K