Dynamics Questions // Elastic Collision with different Vo

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a perfectly elastic collision involving a 2.3 kg object moving at 6.1 m/s and a 3.5 kg object moving in the opposite direction at 4.8 m/s. Participants are attempting to determine the final speeds of both objects after the collision using conservation of momentum and energy principles.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the conservation of momentum and energy equations, attempting to set up the equations correctly. There are questions about the signs used in momentum calculations and the setup of the equations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on checking arithmetic and ensuring the correct setup of equations. There is ongoing confusion regarding the calculations and results, with multiple interpretations of the problem being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about their calculations and mention potential errors in their setups. There is a reference to an answer key that may have contributed to misunderstandings about the expected results.

sunnnystrong
Messages
54
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


[/B]
A 2.3 kg object traveling at 6.1 m/s collides head-on with a 3.5 kg object traveling in the opposite direction at 4.8 m/s. If the collisions is perfectly elastic, what is the final speed of the 2.3 kg object?

Homework Equations



Conservation of Energy:
1/2 m*vi^2 = 1/2 m*vf^2

Conservation of Momentum:
Pix = Pfx

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
Pix For 2.3 kg Object
(2.3kg)(6.1m/s) = (2.3kg)(Vf2) + (3.5kg)(Vf1)

Solving for Vf1 -->
[14.03 Ns - (2.3kg)(Vf2)]/3.5kg = Vf1

KE
1/2(2.3kg)(6.1m/s)^2 = 1/2(2.3kg)(Vf1)^2 + 1/2(3.8kg)(Vf2)^2
42.7915 = 1.15(Vf1)^2 + 1.9(Vf2)^2

Plugging in Vf1
42.7915 = 1.15(0.431837(Vf2)^2-5.26841Vf2 + 16.0686) + 1.9(Vf2)^2
Simplify and you get a quadratic:
0=2.39661 (Vf2)^2 - 6.05867 (Vf2) -24.3126
Solve for Vf2 = 4.69 m/s

Plug back into:
[14.03 Ns - (2.3kg)(Vf2)]/3.5kg = Vf1

Solve for Vf1 = 0.96m/s (which is definitely wrong)

I'm really confused & not sure how to solve for Vf1?


 
Physics news on Phys.org
sunnnystrong said:
Conservation of Momentum:
Pix = Pfx

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
Pix For 2.3 kg Object
(2.3kg)(6.1m/s) = (2.3kg)(Vf2) + (3.5kg)(Vf1)
Total momentum of the system is conserved. Don't forget the initial momentum of the other mass. (Careful with signs!)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sunnnystrong
Doc Al said:
Total momentum of the system is conserved. Don't forget the initial momentum of the other mass. (Careful with signs!)

So going back -->
(2.3kg)(6.1m/s) + (3.5kg)(-4.8m/s) = (2.3kg)(Vf2) + (3.5kg)(Vf1)
Solve for Vf1 :
Vf1 = (-2.77Ns -2.3kg(Vf2))/(3.5kg)
Square it for later use:
0.431837(Vf2)^2 + 1.04016(Vf2) + .6264 = (Vf1)^2

Looking at total system -->
1/2(2.3kg)(6.1m/s)^2 + 1/2(3.5kg)(-4.8m/s)^2 = 1/2(2.3kg)(Vf1)^2 + 1/2(3.8kg)(Vf2)^2
Simplify this:
42.7915+40.32 = 1.15(Vf1)^2 + 1.9(Vf2)^2
Plug in again you get a quadratic:
83.1115 = 1.15(0.431837(Vf2)^2 + 1.04016(Vf2) + .6264) + 1.9(Vf2)^2
Solve
Vf2 = 5.62 m/s :((
I'm confused because the answer is 6.6m/s
 
Doc Al said:
Total momentum of the system is conserved. Don't forget the initial momentum of the other mass. (Careful with signs!)
Do you think you could show me how to set it up?
 
sunnnystrong said:
Do you think you could show me how to set it up?
Your set up looks good to me. (Now that you've corrected the momentum equation.) I didn't check all the steps you did, but if you're getting a different answer than expected double check your arithmetic.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sunnnystrong
Doc Al said:
Your set up looks good to me. (Now that you've corrected the momentum equation.) I didn't check all the steps you did, but if you're getting a different answer than expected double check your arithmetic.
I'm not sure anymore. i went through and combed through my work & can't find where i went wrong.

If you have time, could you look at my last response? I'd really appreciate it as my teacher is useless haha
 
sunnnystrong said:
1/2(2.3kg)(6.1m/s)^2 + 1/2(3.5kg)(-4.8m/s)^2 = 1/2(2.3kg)(Vf1)^2 + 1/2(3.8kg)(Vf2)^2
You used 3.8 kg instead of 3.5 kg. I don't know if that will solve all of your problem, but it is at least part of it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sunnnystrong
TomHart said:
You used 3.8 kg instead of 3.5 kg. I don't know if that will solve all of your problem, but it is at least part of it.
I went back and did it carefully in my notebook but this time got 9m/s which is also wrong XD
at this point i just don't know what went wrong... do you have any ideas? does my set up look right?
 
When I work these perfectly elastic collision problems, it is easy for me to make a mistake. But what I got for an answer was as follows:
The 2.3 kg object initially had a velocity of +6.1 m/s. Its final velocity is -7.055 m/s.
The 3.5 kg object initially had a velocity of -4.8 m/s. Its final velocity is 3.845 m/s.

But like I said, it is easy for me to make mistakes because of the numerous math steps involved.

sunnnystrong said:
does my set up look right?
I thought your set-up looked right. I will try to go through your solution to see if I can find the problem.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sunnnystrong
  • #10
TomHart said:
When I work these perfectly elastic collision problems, it is easy for me to make a mistake. But what I got for an answer was as follows:
The 2.3 kg object initially had a velocity of +6.1 m/s. Its final velocity is -7.055 m/s.
The 3.5 kg object initially had a velocity of -4.8 m/s. Its final velocity is 3.845 m/s.

But like I said, it is easy for me to make mistakes because of the numerous math steps involved.I thought your set-up looked right. I will try to go through your solution to see if I can find the problem.
I'd really appreciate it. this is for my exam on tuesday. This problem & another one has been causing me troubles haha.
I used the same process throughout ^^ However if some of my numbers are weird above ignore those as i went through and did it again and got an answer around 9m/s for the car.
 
  • #11
TomHart said:
When I work these perfectly elastic collision problems, it is easy for me to make a mistake. But what I got for an answer was as follows:
The 2.3 kg object initially had a velocity of +6.1 m/s. Its final velocity is -7.055 m/s.
The 3.5 kg object initially had a velocity of -4.8 m/s. Its final velocity is 3.845 m/s.

But like I said, it is easy for me to make mistakes because of the numerous math steps involved.
I worked through it as well and agree with your answers.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TomHart and sunnnystrong
  • #12
sunnnystrong said:
(2.3kg)(6.1m/s) + (3.5kg)(-4.8m/s) = (2.3kg)(Vf2) + (3.5kg)(Vf1)
sunnnystrong said:
1/2(2.3kg)(6.1m/s)^2 + 1/2(3.5kg)(-4.8m/s)^2 = 1/2(2.3kg)(Vf1)^2 + 1/2(3.8kg)(Vf2)^2
It looks like in the first equation you have the 3.5 kg object's velocity defined as Vf1, and in the second equation you have the 2.3 kg object defined as Vf1. That could be causing a problem.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sunnnystrong
  • #13
Doc Al said:
I worked through it as well and agree with your answers.

TomHart said:
When I work these perfectly elastic collision problems, it is easy for me to make a mistake. But what I got for an answer was as follows:
The 2.3 kg object initially had a velocity of +6.1 m/s. Its final velocity is -7.055 m/s.
The 3.5 kg object initially had a velocity of -4.8 m/s. Its final velocity is 3.845 m/s.

But like I said, it is easy for me to make mistakes because of the numerous math steps involved.I thought your set-up looked right. I will try to go through your solution to see if I can find the problem.

Thanks for your help guys. I actually misread the answer key & the answer is 7 m/s for the speed.
I will go back and find my math error because I set it up right ^^^ but made a mistake
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Doc Al and TomHart
  • #14
sunnnystrong said:
you get a quadratic:
In perfectly elastic collisions there is a shortcut that can avoid quadratics.
Newton's experimental law says that for two given materials (not necessarily perfectly elastic) in a straight line collision the relative velocity afterwards is -R times the initial relative velocity, where R is a constant (coefficient of restitution) depending only on the materials. For a perfectly elastic collision R=1.
Thus, in the present problem, you could write down that the relative velocity after the collision is 6.1+4.8=10.9 m/s (but reversed). Combining that with conservation of momentum gives you the answer without any quadratics.
The law, for the perfectly elastic case, can be deduced fromconservation of energy and momentum.
 
  • #15

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
18K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K