E=mc^2 vs energy in strong interaction

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around comparing the energy of a hydrogen atom, as described by the equation E=mc², with the energy associated with the strong interaction that binds the fundamental particles of the atom. Participants explore the implications of these concepts in the context of particle physics and the nature of mass-energy equivalence.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the total energy from the strong interaction could be more or less than the energy derived from mass using E=mc².
  • Another participant clarifies that the strong interaction binds three quarks together to form a proton, prompting a question about which mass is being converted to energy.
  • A participant notes that the effective mass of the up and down quarks is approximately 5 MeV, while the mass of the proton is around 1 GeV, suggesting that the difference could be attributed to the strong force.
  • There is a consideration of whether the question pertains to the energy required to expel a valence electron compared to the strong force energy in nuclear interactions.
  • One participant discusses the nature of atoms as bound states of charged nuclei and electrons, emphasizing that the relation E=mc² does not hold in the same way when interactions are involved, suggesting the need for corrections in a quantum field theory framework.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing interpretations of the original question and the implications of mass-energy equivalence in the context of strong interactions. There is no consensus on the relationship between the energies discussed, and multiple viewpoints remain active in the conversation.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of mass and energy relationships in systems involving strong interactions and quantum field theory, indicating that assumptions about mass and energy may vary based on the context of the discussion.

Leonardo Ochoa
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I have a simple and foolish question.

I want to compare the energy of a given mass (obviously e=mc2); let's say the energy of a hydrogen atom, with the energy that binds together the fundamental particles of that atom (strong interaction). I know that e=mc2 holds always true, and that the energy in strong interaction is undrainable, but do total energy of strong interaction (in a particular case) could be more or less than the energy you get when transforming mass to energy?

I know I'm confused and possibly both are the same, but appreciate an explanation.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The strong interaction holds three quarks together to form a proton. What mass are you converting to energy?
 
hydrogen atom, 1 proton...
 
Maybe I don't understand the question. But I'll try to answer.

An ionised hydrogen atom is a proton. This is held together by the strong force and quantitatively speaking this is a 3 quark bound state.

Although the idea of individual quark masses is a bit misleading (they always come in bound States), the effective mass of the up and down quarks is ~5 MeV. While the proton is 1 GeV. You could attribute this difference to the strong force.

Alternatively, do you mean the energy taken to expel a valence electron compared to the macroscopic strong force of a few bound nuclei? For example the energy required to fission a He nuclei out of a larger atomic mass nuclei?
 
atom= bound states of charged nuclei with charged electrons... charged= electrically charged and the energy of interaction comes from the electromagnetic interactions...
nuclei= bound states of protons and neutrons ... mainly by strong interactions for large distances/low energies (where the mesonic effective field theories hold)
protons= bound states of quarks and gluons...

And in general the relation E=mc^2 does not hold when you have interactions too, at least not in the same way - because you have to take into account the energy from the interactions... In QFT framework, the mass of such a system should get corrections from calculating further Feynman Diagrams.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K