E-Readers for Academic Reading: Pros and Cons?

  • Thread starter Thread starter eXorikos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Articles
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of e-readers for academic reading, particularly in the context of reading articles, theses, and other scholarly documents. Participants explore the advantages and disadvantages of e-readers compared to traditional paper formats, focusing on aspects such as readability, formatting of graphics, and personal preferences.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the compatibility of academic journals with e-readers, emphasizing the importance of formats like PDF.
  • Concerns are raised regarding the visibility of graphs and formulas on smaller screens, with some suggesting that reading academic papers may be less convenient on e-readers compared to larger formats.
  • One participant mentions that while PDFs are readable on devices like the Kindle 3, the size may be uncomfortable, and they suggest using the Kindle DX for better readability.
  • Another participant notes that while e-readers can be useful for portability, they are not replacements for paper copies, especially for tasks that require note-taking or quick reference to figures and tables.
  • Some express a preference for reading on paper or laptops over e-readers, citing issues with LCD screens and the desire for a more traditional reading experience.
  • One participant shares their experience with converting PDFs to a Kindle-compatible format, highlighting that while text transfers well, tables and equations may not display correctly.
  • There is a mention of the convenience of searching through e-books, which some find beneficial for academic work.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions on the effectiveness of e-readers for academic reading, with no clear consensus on their overall utility. Some appreciate the portability and convenience, while others highlight significant drawbacks related to readability and formatting.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include varying experiences with different e-reader models, the impact of screen size on readability, and the potential for formatting issues with complex documents. Participants also express differing preferences for reading mediums, which may influence their views on e-readers.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to graduate students, researchers, and academics considering the use of e-readers for reading scholarly articles and theses, as well as those exploring alternatives to traditional paper reading.

eXorikos
Messages
281
Reaction score
5
Hi,

I'm starting my thesis next year and I'll be reading a lot of articles and theses and doctorates and stuff. Do any of you use an e-reader for this kind of reading? How good is it? What are the drawbacks?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I wouldn't see why you couldn't, have you ensured that the journals you need are published in pdf or another common format? I would just make sure that the journals you are looking for are published in the format your reader of choice requires.
 


I don't know of a journal that isn't published in pdf. Otherwise there is always a conversionprogram. I don't know the topic yet, but it will be either something in nuclear physics of nuclear solid state physics.

I'm mostly curious if it is nice to read and the graphs and formula are still nicely visible in the text.
 


I only use mine for fiction at the moment, or historical/biographical but without any real graphics.

There might be formatting issues with graphics. I have a Kindle 3 and I haven't converted any pdfs with graphs in them yet, so I'm not sure how well the actual kindle format would handle it. If you leave it as pdf, you lose a lot of the features such as resizing.

I would guess that the graphic portion is almost certainly less convienant than on a computer. Personally I wouldn't want to read those sort of papers in such a small form. When it comes to that I prefer textbook sized, or at least larger than most e-readers.
 


If you use a Ipad, the pdf will look just like it would anywhere else. On a true e-book reader, you may find the size a little restrictive. Most can zoom in, but the refresh rate on the screen may frustrate you as it would take a little longer than you might like to take a closer glance at a graph. The only drawback I could see would be looking at graphs that need to be rendered in color to be easily deciphered. Also the screen size may be a little small when you compare it to a standard sheet of paper. The nook color may be your best bet. The refresh rate of an LCD and the battery life of a ebook, but not as expensive as the Ipad. The size would be the only problem I would foresee. You could play with one at the store to see if you like the interface.
 


If I'm going to spend so much money on an Ipad, I can just as well read on my laptop. I don't like reading on LCD... I also prefer paper, but I want to learn about an alternative.
 


I bought a Kindle 3 recently for exactly this reason, and like it quite much. In hindsight, I should have bought the DX version though. PDFs are shown properly in Kindle 3, but are too small to be read comfortably in full-screen mode; this shouldn't be a problem in the DX. I normally tilt my Kindle 90 degrees and read articles in landscape mode, this works great, but you loose a bit of the overview of tables and figures. I'm currently trying out a software (Calibre) that converts PDF --> .mobi, Kindle's native format, so that the text can be shown with proper size. The text transfers perfectly, but tables and equations are brutally slaughterd.

I should point out that e-readers are NOT REPLACEMENTS for paper copies. You'll want those to scribble notes in, or to quickly flip between the text you're reading and the appendix/table/figure/equation you want to take a peek at. E-readers are great on the go though, so you can have access to heavy books without bringing them along. It's also pretty convenient to search for "where the #&"! did I read that?".

Kindle 3 works great for books btw. In fact it's so great that I've started reading books again, which I haven't done since I was forced to it in high school (6-7 years ago).
 


If by "e-reader" you're referring to electronically-displayed words, I've been e-reading stuff since 1982.

For recreational reading, however, I prefer paper books.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K