Earthquake distance to seismograph

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hypnos_16
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earthquake
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the distance from a seismograph to an earthquake epicenter using the arrival times of P and S waves. The P wave travels at 7.87 km/s and the S wave at 4.86 km/s, with a recorded time difference of 76.8 seconds between their arrivals. The final formula derived for distance (d) is d = Δt * (vs * vp) / (vp - vs), resulting in a calculated distance of approximately 975.9 km from the seismograph to the earthquake.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of seismic wave types: Primary (P) and Secondary (S) waves
  • Knowledge of wave speed calculations in physics
  • Familiarity with algebraic manipulation of equations
  • Basic concepts of seismology and earthquake measurement
NEXT STEPS
  • Study seismic wave propagation and its implications in earthquake analysis
  • Learn about the use of seismographs in measuring earthquake intensity
  • Explore advanced seismology concepts such as wave reflection and refraction
  • Investigate real-time earthquake monitoring systems and their technologies
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics or geology, seismologists, and professionals involved in earthquake preparedness and response will benefit from this discussion.

Hypnos_16
Messages
148
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



When an earthquake occurs, two types of sound waves are generated and travel through the earth. The primary, or P, wave has a speed of about 7.87 km/s and the secondary, or S, wave has a speed of about 4.86 km/s. A seismograph, located some distance away, records the arrival of the P wave and then, 76.8 s later, records the arrival of the S wave. Assuming that the waves travel in a straight line, how far is the seismograph from the earthquake?

Pwave = 7.87km/s OR 7870m/s
Swave = 4.86km/s OR 4860m/s

Homework Equations



I don't think there's an equation specifically for this, if there is, i haven't got it yet

The Attempt at a Solution


I've figured out that when the pwave reaches the station it takes 76.8s for the swave to get there. So the distance at that point is 373.248km or 373248m. But i can't get the distance that it took before then.

Pwave--------------------------------------------| Station
Swave------------|_______________________| Station
x 373,248m

I tried to make it easier to understand, i can't find the distance "x", i know it traveled some distance before getting to the station i just don't know how to find that.
Someone help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose an earthquake occurs at some distance d from the station. How long before the P wave arrives? Write an expression for it. Call that tp. Do the same for the S wave, and call that time ts. Now do something clever with the time difference.
 
gneill said:
Suppose an earthquake occurs at some distance d from the station. How long before the P wave arrives? Write an expression for it. Call that tp. Do the same for the S wave, and call that time ts. Now do something clever with the time difference.

soooo, something like that? but what can i do with that?

tp = d / 7.87m/s
ts = d / 4.86m/s
 
It's probably easier to work symbolically so that there aren't a lot of decimal places cluttering up the thought processes. You've written:

tp = d/vp
ts = d/vs

These are the arrival times for the P and S waves from an even that occurs at an assumed t0 = 0 seconds at distance d.

Now, the information that the seismograph station has to work with is the difference in arrival times. Can you write that equation?
 
tp = d/vp
ts + 76.8 = d/vs

something like that?
 
Don't plug in any values yet. Work symbolically. Write an expression for the time difference between the arrivals, Δt.
 
gneill said:
Don't plug in any values yet. Work symbolically. Write an expression for the time difference between the arrivals, Δt.

okay,

Tp = d/vp
Ts + ΔT = d/vs

so something like that then?
 
Why didn't you use the expression you obtained for ts? You're losing ground!

Δt = ?
 
gneill said:
Why didn't you use the expression you obtained for ts? You're losing ground!

Δt = ?

Δt = 76.8 seconds, the time between when the p wave arrives at the station and then when the s wave arrives.
 
  • #10
You're plugging in numbers again. Write the expression for Δt in terms of the expressions for ts and tp.
 
  • #11
Δt =Ts - Tp

Something more like that?
 
  • #12
Hypnos_16 said:
Δt =Ts - Tp

Something more like that?

Yes, now substitute your expressions for ts and tp.
 
  • #13
gneill said:
Yes, now substitute your expressions for ts and tp.


Δt =Ts - Tp
Δt =d/vs - d/vp
Δt =d(vp - vs) / vs - vp

and come up with something like that i imagine.
 
  • #14
Something like that. But your last line is not correct.

Δt = d/vs - d/vp
Δt = d*(1/vs - 1/vp)
Δt = d*(vs*vp)/(vp - vs)

So now you can solve for d, right?
 
  • #15
gneill said:
Something like that. But your last line is not correct.

Δt = d/vs - d/vp
Δt = d*(1/vs - 1/vp)
Δt = d*(vs*vp)/(vp - vs)

So now you can solve for d, right?

wouldn't you just go

Δt = d/vs - d/vp
Δt = d*(1/vs - 1/vp)
Δt = d*(vs*vp)/(vp - vs)
∆t * (vp - vs) / (vs * vp) = d
?

but that only gives like 6km, so, I'm thinking that isn't how you do it...
 
  • #16
Hypnos_16 said:
wouldn't you just go

Δt = d/vs - d/vp
Δt = d*(1/vs - 1/vp)
Δt = d*(vs*vp)/(vp - vs)
∆t * (vp - vs) / (vs * vp) = d
?

but that only gives like 6km, so, I'm thinking that isn't how you do it...

Sorry, my mistake... sometimes I type faster than I think...:redface:

Δt = d/vs - d/vp
Δt = d*(1/vs - 1/vp)
Δt = d*(vp - vs)/(vs*vp)
d = Δt*(vs*vp)/(vp - vs)
 
  • #17
Happens to me all the time. No worries

So i got the whole thing to be

Tp = d/vp
Ts = d/vs
∆T = Ts - Tp
∆T = (d/vs) - (d/vp)
∆T = d*(1 / vs - 1 / vp)
∆T = d*(vp - vs) / (vs*vp)
d = ∆T*(vs*vp) / (vp - vs)
d = (76.8)(4.86*7.87) / (7.87 - 4.86)
d = 975.9km

which seems like a more likely answer than 6.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
940
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K