I Earth's angular velocity when axis is aligned with apparent gravity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between apparent gravity (g) and true gravity (g0) in noninertial reference frames, as described in John Taylor's "Classical Mechanics." It highlights confusion regarding the alignment of the vertical axis in a coordinate system with g versus g0, particularly in the context of Earth's angular velocity (Ω). Participants clarify that the coordinate system is indeed aligned with g0, suggesting that the inclusion of centrifugal force in the discussion may lead to misunderstandings. Additionally, it is noted that this misalignment affects the ocean's surface, which is not level when considering the coordinate system. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly interpreting the relationship between these gravitational components.
Bastian1978
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
A question about finding the components of Earth's angular velocity when the vertical axis is aligned with apparent gravity (with regards to John Taylor's book "Classical Mechanics")
I've been reading the book "Classical Mechanics" by John Taylor, and in the chapter about noninertial reference frames, it states that the direction of 𝑔 (the apparent gravity, which includes the centrifugal force) is not necessarily aligned with the direction of 𝑔0 (the true gravity direction, directed towards the centre of the Earth).

It goes on to establish a coordinate system for a point on the surface of the Earth at colatitude 𝜃, where the vertical axis is aligned with 𝑔, and the horizontal axes are aligned with north and east. It then states that if Ω (the angular velocity of the Earth) is vertical in the standard coordinate system, we can calculate the components of Ω in the coordinate system described above as:

(0, Ωsin(𝜃), Ωcos(𝜃))

See attached diagram.

I'm confused by this because, as far as I understand, this calculation would only make sense if the coordinate system's vertical direction was aligned with 𝑔0 (so that a vector from the point on the Earth's surface along this direction would be directed towards the centre of the Earth), rather than along 𝑔 (which would mean a vector from the point on the Earth's surface along this direction would not be directed towards the centre of the Earth, due to the included centrifugal force).

Is this just an unstated approximation being made (because the directions of 𝑔 and 𝑔0 are similar), or have I just misunderstood what the book means?

Any help would be really appreciated.

Screen Shot 2024-08-04 at 1.42.18 am.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you're basically right.
The coordinate system is pointing along g0.

Maybe it's unfortunate that they tell you about lumping centrifugal force in with g in the chapter before.
That sounds like s strange practice. More likely than not, they'd just include another centrifugal force term in the acceleration.

Fun fact: Since water follows an equipotential surface perpendicular to g, the ocean isn't level with this coordinate system anymore.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top