Economics Majors & Career Advice: What's the Best Choice?

  • Thread starter Thread starter complexPHILOSOPHY
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Economics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the various specializations within an Economics major and the implications for career prospects, particularly in relation to the mathematical rigor of the field. Participants explore the balance between personal interest in economics and mathematics, as well as the perceived employability of different specializations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses interest in Economic Theory but questions its employability outside of academia, considering a second major in pure mathematics versus applied mathematics.
  • Another participant notes that undergraduate economics courses do not delve deeply into mathematics, despite the reliance on mathematical models.
  • Some participants argue that the mathematical content in economics is limited to basic calculus and statistics, with advanced topics being less common in undergraduate programs.
  • There is a suggestion that while economics can be seen as lacking in mathematical depth, those interested in statistics and stochastic processes may find opportunities in industry.
  • One participant critiques the theoretical aspects of economics, describing them as unrealistic and overly reliant on assumptions, while others question the extent of mathematics used in the field.
  • There is a mention of the potential to enhance mathematical skills through self-study in advanced topics like stochastic calculus, which could differentiate students in the job market.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit disagreement regarding the depth of mathematics in economics and its implications for employability. Some believe that economics lacks rigorous mathematical training, while others assert that it can be pursued at a higher mathematical level through elective courses. The discussion remains unresolved on the best path for combining economics with mathematics.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in the mathematical training provided in undergraduate economics programs, suggesting a reliance on core courses rather than advanced electives. There is also a recognition of varying personal experiences with the subject matter.

complexPHILOSOPHY
Messages
365
Reaction score
2
Assuming I were to major in Economics, there are a few different specializations available: Business Economics, Macroeconomics and Finance, Economic Theory, Econometrics and Empirical Economics, and International Economics and Development.

Economic Theory seems the most appealing to me, however, I am not sure how employable this major is and what career options I would have, aside from academia. In conjunction with one of these economics specializations, I want to do a second major in pure maths, although, I think applied maths would have better synergy with an economics degree, but I enjoy the study of pure mathematics more.

Any information and advice regarding this situation, would be highly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Based on the economics courses I took as an undergrad, I've got to say none of them delve too deeply into mathematics even though most of the models rely heavily on mathematics for justification. It's just your average economics major can't handle all that much math.

I don't know much about employability of the subjects, but it's always best to choose what you like and do well. I tend to like macroeconomics and international economics the best out of those. Microeconomic theory seems a little too dull to me. Same with econometrics. But to each his own.
 
AsianSensationK said:
Based on the economics courses I took as an undergrad, I've got to say none of them delve too deeply into mathematics even though most of the models rely heavily on mathematics for justification. It's just your average economics major can't handle all that much math.

I don't know much about employability of the subjects, but it's always best to choose what you like and do well. I tend to like macroeconomics and international economics the best out of those. Microeconomic theory seems a little too dull to me. Same with econometrics. But to each his own.

There is not much mathematics actually used in economics? I was under the impression economists use high-level mathematics and computer models.
 
There is not much mathematics actually used in economics? I was under the impression economists use high-level mathematics and computer models.

Economics is widely known as "the dismal science". The grand theoretical aspect of the subject is a farce, IMO, just a bunch of mathematical gee-whiz where such-and-such convex model is shown to have an equilibrium i.e. non-constructive existence theorems which make too many unrealistic assumptions to seem powerful or interesting.

Then you mention computer models. If you like statistics and stochastic processes this could be a way to go, but these guys seem to be 20 years behind the cutting edge of nonlinear dynamics found in physics or applied math. Here there is a lot of constructive predictive work, and this is the sort of economist who is hired in industry.

Honestly, the only reasons I can think to recommend economics are (1) worried about your future earning potential, would rather be a big fish in little pond or (2) you want to go theoretical and be a pioneer.

I once had a economics teacher who said "what could be more interesting then money". I guess if you agree with him, that might be a reason to become an economist as well.
 
There isn't much mathematics in undergraduate economics. The two mathematical oriented econ classes are probably mathematical econ and econometrics. However in regular school they are just calculus and statistics for econ.
You can make it be more mathematical than it supposed to be yourself. Study on stochastic calculus and BSM model can advanced you from many other students.
 
complexPHILOSOPHY said:
There is not much mathematics actually used in economics? I was under the impression economists use high-level mathematics and computer models.
It is mathematical, but as an undergrad it's at the level of elementary algebra, calculus, and some statistics in econometrics.

I didn't take any electives for the major though, just the core courses at michigan (intermediate micro, intermediate macro, intro econometrics). I suppose some undergrads could elect to take more advanced courses their fourth year.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K
Replies
28
Views
3K