Effective Action for Scalar and Fermion Fields

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter The black vegetable
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Effective action
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the effective action for a Lagrangian that includes both scalar and fermion fields, referencing Peskin and Schroeder's work, specifically Equation 11.63. The participants confirm that the same formula can be applied to fermionic fields, emphasizing the need to treat Dirac fermions as Grassmann-number valued fields. They highlight the importance of correctly handling differentiation and integration with respect to Grassmann variables to maintain the anticommutation properties of field operators. The general technique for deriving effective actions remains consistent across bosons and fermions, with caution required regarding signs in the fermionic case.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of effective action in quantum field theory
  • Familiarity with Grassmann variables and their properties
  • Knowledge of Lagrangian mechanics in quantum field theory
  • Experience with path-integral formalism, particularly for fermions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Peskin and Schroeder, specifically Section 11.4 and Equation 11.63
  • Learn about Grassmann algebra and its application in quantum field theory
  • Explore the path-integral formalism for fermions in detail, referencing Section 9.5 of Peskin and Schroeder
  • Read "Introduction to Gauge Field Theory" by D. Bailin and A. Love for additional insights on path-integral methods
USEFUL FOR

Quantum field theorists, theoretical physicists, and advanced students seeking to understand the effective action for systems involving both scalar and fermionic fields.

The black vegetable
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Using effective action to derive the one loop contribution of aa scalar field and fermion field
I am reading Peskin and Schroeder Section 11.4. They derive a formula for the effective action p.372 Equation 11.63 using a scalar field interaction,
They use this formula to determine the effective potential. If I want to do the same for a Lagrangian with with a scalar field and fermion field, can I use the same Formula reasoning and technique to get a formula for a scalar field and fermion field?

<br /> \Gamma \left ( \phi _{cl} \right )=\int d^{4}L_{1}\left [ \phi _{cl} \right ]+\frac{i}{2}\log\text{Det}\left [ \frac{\partial ^{2}L_{1}}{\partial \phi \partial \phi } \right ] - i\: Connected\: Diagrams+\int d^{4}x\delta L\left [ \phi _{cl} \right ].\tag{11.63}<br />

If so do you treat the Dirac Fermion \bar{\Psi } \Psi as two different fields?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can use the same formula also for fermionic fields, but you must be aware that these fields must be described as Grassmann-number valued and that the differentiation and integration with respect to Grassmann numbers/fields are modified. This is all necessary to get the anticommutation properties of the corresponding field operators correctly mapped to the functional formalism.
 
Ok Thanks, very helpful I have some notes on Grassmann variables that I will revisit, but can I start as Peskin and Schroeder did with a new Lagrangian but this time containing a scaler field and a fermionic field expanding both
## \phi \rightarrow \phi _{cl}+\eta ##
##\Psi \rightarrow \Psi _{cl}+\xi##

Then comparing the ##\eta^{2}## to get a value for ##\frac{\delta ^{2}L_{1}}{\delta \phi \delta\phi }##

Or maybe I'm not following it very well
 
The general technique is the same for fermions and bosons. You have to be only careful with the signs for the fermionic case using Grassmann variables. Peskin&Schroeder also treats fermions in the path-integral formalism (Sect. 9.5).

Another very good book using the path-integral formalism from the very beginning is

D. Bailin and A. Love, Introduction to Gauge Field Theory,
Adam Hilger, Bristol and Boston (1986).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: The black vegetable
vanhees71 said:
The general technique is the same for fermions and bosons. You have to be only careful with the signs for the fermionic case using Grassmann variables. Peskin&Schroeder also treats fermions in the path-integral formalism (Sect. 9.5).

Another very good book using the path-integral formalism from the very beginning is

D. Bailin and A. Love, Introduction to Gauge Field Theory,
Adam Hilger, Bristol and Boston (1986).
Okay thanks for your help
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
945
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K