When it is fitted to supernova observations, our standard picture of the cosmos tells us that the current boundary of the universe which can affect us is at z = 1.73.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

As of today, no event that occurs beyond that limit can ever be known to us or have any causal effect.

This is primarily based on empirical observation, not on theory.Whatever the underlying reason may be, we have observed evidence of accelerated expansion. From which this causal limit follows.

The question is how to assimilate this into our theoretical model. What has been causing this accelerated expansion? How should we write it into the equations so that they will predict what we have seen? If there are several ways to re-write the equations to be consistent with observation, then which way is simplest and involves the least "made-up" stuff?

Easson Frampton Smoot have proposed to include a BOUNDARY TERM in the equation defining the model that would represent whatever is right on this boundary.

EFS have now shown that their proposal is approximatelyconsistentwith the observed amount of acceleration. So it is a candidate: one of the possible ways of adapting the standard cosmo equations.

They add a boundary term, but then they do not need an exotic "dark energy", or an ad hoc "cosmological constant" whose small but positive size has puzzled some people because it looks like fine tuning.

However a natural and fairly frequent reaction to the EFS proposal is to say "Isn't this circular reasoning?"

So that is what this thread is intended for. Is it circular reasoning? In what sense? And if so, is that bad?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Effective universe cutoff at z=1.73, is this circular logic?

Loading...

Similar Threads for Effective universe cutoff | Date |
---|---|

About the effects of relativity when measuring the age of the universe | Nov 19, 2014 |

Life in the process of universe: the goal or just a side effect? | Jul 15, 2012 |

What are the Physical effects of the expansion of the Universe | Mar 13, 2012 |

Local effects of universal expansion | Jan 15, 2011 |

Gravities effect on the boundaries of the Universe | Nov 20, 2009 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**