I Effects of Supermassive Black Hole Merger on Nearby Bodies

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Hornbein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black holes Holes
Hornbein
Gold Member
Messages
3,405
Reaction score
2,777
TL;DR Summary
What would be the effect of a merger of supermassive black holes?
What would be the effects of a merger of supermassive black holes? Such releases by far the greatest amount of energy of any event in our Universe as gravitational waves.

I suppose that a great deal of EM radiation is released, but I'm more interested in the gravitational waves. The resulting black hole may be accellerated so that it exits the galaxy at considerable velocity. But I'm mostly interested in the effect on nearby heavenly bodies. Such would have little effect on small objects but stars and planets would be fair game. I wonder whether a star or planet with resonant frequency close to that of the g waves would be destroyed, and if so at what range.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hornbein said:
Summary: What would be the effect of a merger of supermassive black holes?

What would be the effects of a merger of supermassive black holes? Such releases by far the greatest amount of energy of any event in our Universe as gravitational waves.

I suppose that a great deal of EM radiation is released, but I'm more interested in the gravitational waves. The resulting black hole may be accellerated so that it exits the galaxy at considerable velocity.

Regarding the two supermassive black holes themselves, neither would be ejected anywhere. Before the merger, they would be rotating around their common barycenter, and after the merger, the resulting merged (and larger) supermassive black hole would remain at that common barycenter.

That said, any nearby, gravitationally locked bodies (stars, planets, etc) could -- but not necessarily would -- get slingshotted out of the region, as part of the process of the merger.

Hornbein said:
But I'm mostly interested in the effect on nearby heavenly bodies. Such would have little effect on small objects but stars and planets would be fair game. I wonder whether a star or planet with resonant frequency close to that of the g waves would be destroyed, and if so at what range.

I'll leave this for others to comment on. But I'm pretty confident that nearby stars and planets would not be destroyed (assuming they are not so close to be a part of the accretion disks), and I speculate that it wouldn't even be very dramatic.
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top