I Effects of Supermassive Black Hole Merger on Nearby Bodies

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hornbein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black holes Holes
Click For Summary
The merger of supermassive black holes releases immense energy primarily in the form of gravitational waves, which can significantly affect nearby celestial bodies. While small objects may remain unaffected, larger bodies like stars and planets could experience gravitational slingshot effects, potentially being ejected from their orbits. The resonance of gravitational waves with nearby stars or planets raises concerns about possible destruction, although it is suggested that such catastrophic outcomes are unlikely unless these bodies are very close to the merger. The merged black hole itself would remain at the common barycenter of the original black holes, and the overall impact on nearby bodies may not be as dramatic as initially feared. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for comprehending the broader implications of black hole mergers in galactic evolution.
Hornbein
Gold Member
Messages
3,551
Reaction score
2,926
TL;DR
What would be the effect of a merger of supermassive black holes?
What would be the effects of a merger of supermassive black holes? Such releases by far the greatest amount of energy of any event in our Universe as gravitational waves.

I suppose that a great deal of EM radiation is released, but I'm more interested in the gravitational waves. The resulting black hole may be accellerated so that it exits the galaxy at considerable velocity. But I'm mostly interested in the effect on nearby heavenly bodies. Such would have little effect on small objects but stars and planets would be fair game. I wonder whether a star or planet with resonant frequency close to that of the g waves would be destroyed, and if so at what range.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hornbein said:
Summary: What would be the effect of a merger of supermassive black holes?

What would be the effects of a merger of supermassive black holes? Such releases by far the greatest amount of energy of any event in our Universe as gravitational waves.

I suppose that a great deal of EM radiation is released, but I'm more interested in the gravitational waves. The resulting black hole may be accellerated so that it exits the galaxy at considerable velocity.

Regarding the two supermassive black holes themselves, neither would be ejected anywhere. Before the merger, they would be rotating around their common barycenter, and after the merger, the resulting merged (and larger) supermassive black hole would remain at that common barycenter.

That said, any nearby, gravitationally locked bodies (stars, planets, etc) could -- but not necessarily would -- get slingshotted out of the region, as part of the process of the merger.

Hornbein said:
But I'm mostly interested in the effect on nearby heavenly bodies. Such would have little effect on small objects but stars and planets would be fair game. I wonder whether a star or planet with resonant frequency close to that of the g waves would be destroyed, and if so at what range.

I'll leave this for others to comment on. But I'm pretty confident that nearby stars and planets would not be destroyed (assuming they are not so close to be a part of the accretion disks), and I speculate that it wouldn't even be very dramatic.
 
Moderator's note: Spin-off from another thread due to topic change. In the second link referenced, there is a claim about a physical interpretation of frame field. Consider a family of observers whose worldlines fill a region of spacetime. Each of them carries a clock and a set of mutually orthogonal rulers. Each observer points in the (timelike) direction defined by its worldline's tangent at any given event along it. What about the rulers each of them carries ? My interpretation: each...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
69
Views
7K
Replies
19
Views
2K