MHB Efficiency of Sieve vs. Derivative Method for Primality Testing

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hugo1177
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Test
Hugo1177
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
We can determinate if one number is prime with the modulo operation.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346647223_Primality_Test_Formula
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hugo1177 said:
We can determinate if one number is prime with the modulo operation.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346647223_Primality_Test_Formula
Interesting. However I find the usual sieve of Erastothenes to be simpler and less time consuming. (I believe that the two methods are related to each other anyway.)

-Dan
 
I am not an expert in computational time, are you sure that the sieve is better for big numbers? I hear that there aren´t a efficient form to determinate if a number is prime or not in polynomial time. Here you only have to do the 30th or 40th derivative and divide one number relatively big by other
 
Hugo1177 said:
I am not an expert in computational time, are you sure that the sieve is better for big numbers? I hear that there aren´t a efficient form to determinate if a number is prime or not in polynomial time. Here you only have to do the 30th or 40th derivative and divide one number relatively big by other
I'm not an expert either. I'm simply guessing that taking derivatives is more time consuming than doing the sieve. I admit I may be wrong.

-Dan
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
96
Views
11K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top