Efficiently Compute the Inverse of a Matrix Using Tricky Techniques

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter peterlam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Matrix
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around techniques for computing the inverse of a matrix, specifically exploring whether the inverse of a matrix constructed from the square of the entries of an existing inverse matrix can be derived directly from the original matrix. The scope includes theoretical considerations and properties of positive definite matrices.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that if A is an invertible n-by-n matrix, then constructing a matrix C from the squares of the entries of its inverse B may allow for the computation of the inverse of C directly from A.
  • Another participant counters that C is not necessarily invertible, providing a specific example of matrices B and C to illustrate this point.
  • A different participant suggests that if A is positive definite, then B and C should also be positive definite, raising the question of whether the inverse of C can still be computed directly from A in this scenario.
  • One participant challenges the assumption that squaring the entries of B will yield a general result regarding the invertibility of C, referencing properties of determinants and their behavior under such transformations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the invertibility of matrix C and the implications of positive definiteness, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations regarding the conditions under which the proposed methods may or may not hold, particularly concerning the properties of the matrices involved and the assumptions about their entries.

peterlam
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Suppose A is a invertible n-by-n matrix. Let B be the inverse of A, i.e. B = A^(-1).It is trivial that A = B^(-1).

If we construct a matrix C whose entry is the square of corresponding entry of B, i.e. C_ij = (B_ij)^2, then we compute the inverse of C.

We can compute the inverse of C directly from A without going through the inverse operation twice?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
C is not necessarily invertible, so the answer to your question is "no".

For example
[tex]B = \begin{matrix} 1 & -1 \cr 1 & 1 \end{matrix}[/tex]

[tex]C = \begin{matrix} 1 & 1 \cr 1 & 1 \end{matrix}[/tex]
 
What if we only consider A is positive definite? Then B is positive definite and C should be positive definite too.

Can we compute the inverse of C directly from A in this case?

Thank you!
 
In my counterexample B is positive definite.

x^T B x = x_1^2 + x_2^2

You can write any inverse matrix explicitly in terms of determinants of the matrix and submatrices (this is equivalent to Cramer's rule for solving equations). Think about how a derminant is calculated, and what happens to it if you square all the entries in the matrix. I think it is very unlikely you will get any general result about this.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K