Efficiently Compute the Inverse of a Matrix Using Tricky Techniques

  • Thread starter Thread starter peterlam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Matrix
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the computation of the inverse of a matrix C, derived from the square of the entries of the inverse matrix B of an invertible matrix A. It is established that C is not necessarily invertible, leading to the conclusion that one cannot compute the inverse of C directly from A. When considering A as positive definite, the properties of B and C being positive definite are noted, but this does not change the inability to derive C's inverse from A. The conversation emphasizes the complexity of determinants and the implications of squaring matrix entries on invertibility. Ultimately, no general result can be guaranteed for computing the inverse of C from A.
peterlam
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Suppose A is a invertible n-by-n matrix. Let B be the inverse of A, i.e. B = A^(-1).It is trivial that A = B^(-1).

If we construct a matrix C whose entry is the square of corresponding entry of B, i.e. C_ij = (B_ij)^2, then we compute the inverse of C.

We can compute the inverse of C directly from A without going through the inverse operation twice?

Thank you!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
C is not necessarily invertible, so the answer to your question is "no".

For example
B = \begin{matrix} 1 & -1 \cr 1 & 1 \end{matrix}

C = \begin{matrix} 1 & 1 \cr 1 & 1 \end{matrix}
 
What if we only consider A is positive definite? Then B is positive definite and C should be positive definite too.

Can we compute the inverse of C directly from A in this case?

Thank you!
 
In my counterexample B is positive definite.

x^T B x = x_1^2 + x_2^2

You can write any inverse matrix explicitly in terms of determinants of the matrix and submatrices (this is equivalent to Cramer's rule for solving equations). Think about how a derminant is calculated, and what happens to it if you square all the entries in the matrix. I think it is very unlikely you will get any general result about this.
 
Good morning I have been refreshing my memory about Leibniz differentiation of integrals and found some useful videos from digital-university.org on YouTube. Although the audio quality is poor and the speaker proceeds a bit slowly, the explanations and processes are clear. However, it seems that one video in the Leibniz rule series is missing. While the videos are still present on YouTube, the referring website no longer exists but is preserved on the internet archive...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K